• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Introductions to Philosophy

Theophilus7

Senior Member
Sep 21, 2003
725
22
England
Visit site
✟23,472.00
Faith
Christian
Hi,

I am looking for some introductions to Philosophy, either from a Christian perspective (preferably not a Calvinist) or neutral; in other words, something that a Christian beginner in philosophy would be happy to read. (I have no objections to reading agnostic and atheist philosophers later, but as a beginner I would naturally prefer to start in my own camp.) I have Norman Geisler's intro. on my list. Also J.P Moreland and William Lane Craig's volume (though this is more an intermediate text). Can anyone point me to some other introductions on Amazon?


T7
 
F

ForeRunner

Guest
Upvote 0
S

Silver Speak

Guest
ForeRunner said:
If you are looking for an introduction to philosophy you aren't going to get christian philosophers, as philosophy pre-dates Christianity. It is generally considered to have begun with the ancient greeks.
Good point! Not all of it, though... There are modern philosophers too. I can't think of any right now but I'll let you know. Well, there's Kierkegaard, not sure if you can call him a 'christian philosopher' and there are lots of contraries in his views...
 
Upvote 0

Philosoft

Orthogonal, Tangential, Tenuously Related
Dec 26, 2002
5,427
188
52
Southeast of Disorder
Visit site
✟6,503.00
Faith
Atheist
Apart from Craig, Alvin Plantinga is a very highly regarded Christian philosopher. I find a good deal of his stuff pretentious and overly self-serving, but it is at least readable, and Plantinga is notably unafraid of having his work challenged.
 
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,877
✟367,481.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Theophilus7 said:
I am looking for some introductions to Philosophy, either from a Christian perspective (preferably not a Calvinist) or neutral...
Do you mean an easy-to-read Christian philosopher, or a easy-to read history of philosophy?

I'd start with a history of philosophy, even though some of the best ones are by non-Christians (I'm reading the fantastic History of Philosophy by Copleston, a Jesuit priest, but that's 11 volumes :sigh: ).

BTW, why not Calvinist?

-- Radagast
 
Upvote 0

Norseman

EAC Representative
Apr 29, 2004
4,706
256
22
Currently in China
✟28,677.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
If you want a neutral beginning to philosophy, I suggest: http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=78920

The list of documents is kept at IIDB, but the actual documents are at http://www.eblaforum.org

The list provides links because the Ebla forum thing doesn't have the same system.

Anyway, the guy that wrote it is totally neutral (at least as far as I have read) on everything from Epistemology to Metaphysics, to Ethics, you name it!

I'd advise going in order. I tried starting on #10 or such and quickly found out I had no idea what he was talking about because he had covered the material in previous sections.
 
Upvote 0

burrow_owl

Senior Contributor
Aug 17, 2003
8,561
381
49
Visit site
✟40,726.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I'd strongly advise not reading a specifically christian introduction to philosophy.

They unnecessarily muddy the waters, which often aren't clear to begin with, and when it comes to the existentialist and 'post-modern' philosophers, the things I've read have flat-out misrepresented their thought (I remember reading Ravi Zacharias a while ago in which he wrote that Sartre said X. It looked suspicious, so I walked over to my bookshelf, picked up the cited text, and found that Sartre actually wrote something like 'We existentialists have been charged with thinking X'. The rest of the essay was a rebuttal of X. Selective quoting at its absolute worst.).
 
Upvote 0

Philosoft

Orthogonal, Tangential, Tenuously Related
Dec 26, 2002
5,427
188
52
Southeast of Disorder
Visit site
✟6,503.00
Faith
Atheist
Lee Strobel recounted an interview with Zacharias in one of Strobel's 'Christianity must be true because it makes me feel so darn good about myself' novelistic love-fests. Humorously enough, he made Zacharias sound like Pat Robertson on Prozac.
 
Upvote 0

burrow_owl

Senior Contributor
Aug 17, 2003
8,561
381
49
Visit site
✟40,726.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Philosoft said:
Humorously enough, he made Zacharias sound like Pat Robertson on Prozac.
After I read that Zacharias book, I have so little respect for the man. So little. Only a scoundrel, or an idiot, can misquote Sartre. I mean, Sartre is the man. Clearly, Zacharias is a disengenuous non-scholar, but it personally insulted me. Perhaps that's because 'existentialism' has been such an historical target of lame-o Christian or reactionary 'thinkers', or maybe it's just that I think Sartre is dead-on, but I get pretty fierce when he's attacked on bogus charges.
 
Upvote 0

Philosoft

Orthogonal, Tangential, Tenuously Related
Dec 26, 2002
5,427
188
52
Southeast of Disorder
Visit site
✟6,503.00
Faith
Atheist
burrow_owl said:
After I read that Zacharias book, I have so little respect for the man. So little. Only a scoundrel, or an idiot, can misquote Sartre. I mean, Sartre is the man. Clearly, Zacharias is a disengenuous non-scholar, but it personally insulted me. Perhaps that's because 'existentialism' has been such an historical target of lame-o Christian or reactionary 'thinkers', or maybe it's just that I think Sartre is dead-on, but I get pretty fierce when he's attacked on bogus charges.
Too true. Existentialism is an unfair target, mainly because most non-philosophers are only exposed to it in grade school as the stuff that Thoreau beiieved, and wasn't he a weirdo? living in the woods and writing esoteric poetry.
 
Upvote 0