Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Her life may be in 'danger' but when an abortion happens, someone always dies. No, there is never a reason.Archivist said:So a woman shouldn't have the right to an abortion even if her life is in danger?
New rule. Whenever a woman dies in childbirth, we kill the man who impregnated her. After all, it's cause and effect, if he did not get her pregnant, she would not have died. The method of death has to involve pain matched to the level of the woman.CrownCaster said:Her life may be in 'danger' but when an abortion happens, someone always dies. No, there is never a reason.
It's not just cause and effect, it's also intent. With an abortion there is an intent to kill, when there is an impregnation there is not.New rule. Whenever a woman dies in childbirth, we kill the man who impregnated her. After all, it's cause and effect, if he did not get her pregnant, she would not have died. The method of death has to involve pain matched to the level of the woman.
CrownCaster said:Her life may be in 'danger' but when an abortion happens, someone always dies. No, there is never a reason.
Yes, there are exceptions.CrownCaster said:My stance? Abortion is murder 100% of the time. There are NO exceptions. There are NO good reasons to play God. A woman who has an abortion needs to know two things.
1- She has committed murder to one of Gods prescious little ones that He entrusted to her
2- There is forgiveness in Christ for doing so.
Whatever has happened to a person, it is NEVER the baby' fault.
That's not quite the question; the question is whether this life is a person, the answer to which turns on where we locate the source of personhood. Many of us would locate it in the brain - without a brain, it's still life, but is it a person to whom rights and responsibilities accrue?DoseOFReality said:Do we, as human beings, recognize the "thing" inside the womb as life?
When does a human being become recognized as person? and during what process of pregnancy do we define this blob of blood as life?
But see: Peter Singer for a dissenting view on whether we ought to grant rights in accordance with such a hard-and-fast rule. Outside of people, we tend to give out rights per a kind of sliding scale that roughly tracks brain development. He then makes the case that not doing in so in people isn't as rational as our anthrocentric framework would have it.Because if the fetus inside the womb is by definition life, then it rightfully assumes the basic human rights which includes the right to live.
A cow is a life, isn't it? Why don't we grant it the same rights we grant a 5 year-old?If the fetus is infact life, does it not have the same right as would a 5 year old boy? If so, then the difference between the 5 year old boy and the fetus would be the location.
Post #106 will help you to see why women and men choose abortion. It is a long one but if you read you will see what is behind the descion to have an abortion. It is not what most people think.homewardbound said:Does anyone else wonder why that should change just because the child is still in the womb?
I get your point but I am not speaking of selling kidneys for food, I am saying that in the case of abortion (which is the topic) it is the womans choice to do what she wants with her body (meaning the fetus inside her body).larryicr said:First, i wanted to point out that women can NOT do "whatever" they want to their own bodies, that is a very bad argument for abortion rights. She is not allowed to sell 1 of her kidneys - not even if she needs the money for food to live on.
An interesting and thought-provoking post, although I don't think it makes a compelling case for abortion. At least your posts aren't laced with anger like so many others. I appreciate that.Khrissy78 said:Post #106 will help you to see why women and men choose abortion. It is a long one but if you read you will see what is behind the descion to have an abortion. It is not what most people think.
How can you argue for someone's right to sin, and at the same time argue against someone's right to judge that sin?I am not arguing soley for abortion rights, there is no doubt it is a sin. I am arguing for a womens right to choose and to not be judged because of that decsion.
In no way am I arguing...All I am saying is that if women chooses to sin it is her own choice to make with out us judging her. We are not in the same place as a women who is faced with this decsion so how can we judge her? Im not being hateful to anyone who opposes abortion, nor am I judging them. My posts are only stating that we need to help these women and not condem them, how is that wrong or judgemental? I have not already judged if I believe it is a sin, I am to dislike the sin not the sinner.larryicr said:How can you argue for someone's right to sin, and at the same time argue against someone's right to judge that sin?
If there is no doubt it is a sin, then you have already judged. That's all i am really saying, i would not claim that a woman who had an abortion is any "worse" a sinner than the rest of us. But, i think we have to call it sin - and i'm glad that's what you all it.
Thanks for seeing that I am not being hateful.homewardbound said:An interesting and thought-provoking post, although I don't think it makes a compelling case for abortion. At least your posts aren't laced with anger like so many others. I appreciate that.
Lest you think I'm not sensitive to the plight many women face, that's not the case. My daughter is unmarried, part-time employed, no college or trade school education, and has had two children in less than two years by two different fathers, one of which lives 700 miles away. The three of them have a mountain of challenges ahead of them. Every argument you could make about the impact on career, social life, quality of life, etc. applies. Abortion would have made her life much easier in one sense, but she chose to act selflessly, and now has two beautiful sons. Yes, their life will be very difficult, as will my daughter's. But I can't begin to adequately describe what a pecious gift they are. My daughter would be the first to tell you that she's made some mistakes, but she'd also tell you without hesitation that she's glad she carried those two boys full term.
I couldn't agree more.Khrissy78 said:As one of my post said, most women are emotionally depressed after this choice. Just because one person ends up happy and healthy doesnt mean the next one will. My posts are only for the purpose of helping these women realize that they can be forgiven not just condemed and that they can find peace in Christ.
Amen. I hope nothing I post ever makes anyone feel condemned, and I would hope that no one else posting here would do anything to make someone feel like they're a murderer or evil. I'll close by saying that while I believe abortion is wrong in God's eyes, women do have that the right to make that choice....that's the prevailing law in our country. I'd like to think that one day we'll find a way to encourage and support all women coping with this decision and help them understand that there are alternatives. It might not be easy, but sometimes our actions have difficult consequences. Until then, I hope any woman who has had an abortion understands that God loves them every bit as much now as He did the day they had that abortion, just as He'll love them every day forward.Khrissy78 said:Oh one more thing...I am not trying to make a compelling case, I just want people to see that the women who have abortions are not some mean evil creatures. They are human beings with feelings and its not just a random thing for these girls, its a life long descion that will affect them for the rest of their lives.
G-d uses humans as G-d's agents in many things. Should we assume that it is not G-d's will when a pregnancy is terminated?homewardbound said:I always thought it was God who decided when we enter and leave this world. That goes for men, women, children, and the unborn. If a mother's life is threatened by a pregnancy it's a tragic thing, for sure, but from a biblical perspective, I can't find anything that says it's up to us to judge whether that's more tragic than taking the life of the unborn.
I know this issue is an emotionally-charged one, but I hope future posters will refrain from painting this as a male vs. female matter, or calling abortion murder. If you want to shame someone for what they believe, surely there's a better forum for that.
I know of many men, and some women, who far from laying down their lives for their children, endanger these young lives. Whether through abandonment, and neglect or direct violence and abuse.I don't know a single mother (or father, for that matter) who wouldn't lay down her life for one of her children. Does anyone else wonder why that should change just because the child is still in the womb?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?