Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Archivist said:You could argue that the Puritans in pre-Revolutionary New England lived in a theocracy. Although the church wasn't in direct control, it did exercise a great deal of control over the authorities.
The child is permanently killed by abortion. Why would a mother have a "right" to kill another human, especially her own child. It is a sick society that advocates a mother killing her own child.Zen_Woof said:Greetings.
Her body is permanently changed by carrying a child. Who has more "right" to make decisions for that fetus?
I do not believe the woman is ever responcible for someone hitting her. I agree she could have been smarter, especially if he has a history of abuses, but it is ultimately the man's fault for the death of the unborn child in such a case.Zen_Woof said:if a woman is being abused by her husband and he hits her in the stomach, causing her to abort, who is liable? The husband for the hitting? Or the woman for not leaving someone she knows is an abuser?
The woman is entirely responcible for this.Zen_Woof said:What if a woman is a drug user and the fetus aborts?
I think this is rediculous. Men have just as much responcibility to be involved with their children and I think there should be much more forceful legal action taken against them.Zen_Woof said:And what does everyone think about the fact that it's ultimately a woman's problem. Men can go on blithely and ignore their children, but a woman is a mother forever.
While I agree that the woman risks death by carrying the child, I do think that if my wife wanted an abortion and I did not I should be able to legaly override her decision. It would be her choice then to get her "tubes tied" or whatever to prevent further pregnancies (because that decision is stricktly hers, I won't argue it). I think that in cases of unwed mothers, the guy has no rights because he is not married to her so it IS purely her choice how to handle the pregnancy. While I'm not comfortable with allowing that choice, at the present time it is availible and I don't really blame them for excersizing their choice.Zen_Woof said:She risks death (yes, death) by carrying a child. Her body is permanently changed by carrying a child. Who has more "right" to make decisions for that fetus?
Monica02 said:The child is permanently killed by abortion. Why would a mother have a "right" to kill another human, especially her own child. It is a sick society that advocates a mother killing her own child.
Monica02 said:The child is permanently killed by abortion. Why would a mother have a "right" to kill another human, especially her own child. It is a sick society that advocates a mother killing her own child.
Zen_Woof said:I agree with your points as a father and husband. I am thinking of those men who get a woman pregnant and then pretend they don't know them.
Karenswalk said:God reconizes the baby from the even before the moment of conception. That is all that should matter. Abortion is wrong. People use dumb excuses in order to have them. It is very rare that a mothers life is in danger due to a pregnancy. I thought this a christian forum board. I don't see to many christians on here.
Caprice said:I was about to respond to your statement but in the process of doing so I realized that I sound like a facist. While that may be the truth in this case, and I think that is OK, I'd rather not go into the details of my thoughts here other than to say that the man involved, once proven to be the dad, would be in pretty sorry shape financially, socialy, and legaly for the rest of his life if my thoughts were law.
Jhn 19:11 Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power [at all] against me, except it were given thee from above:Archivist said:But our courts can't make decisions based on God's law, they are restricted to the Constitution and the laws of the United States.
That is why women must have the right to choose.
Praise God for the understanding He has granted you sister. Regardless of what people think or who will follow the problems of this world only have one solution... Not money, not war.. GodThough many people won't accept the salution, God still is regardless the salution. All4one can't make everyone listen to him. But God can and will.
My view quite simply is don't have an abortion.
Praise God!No, women should not have the right to murder anymore then anyone else should.
This is lukewarm though. Where did "thy will be done" disappear to? It has become "my will be done"? Now it is what best benifits a person? How many Christians here would finish the race and die for Christ if the time comes? Our death may not look like the best benifit for ourselves.I think life is always a precious thing, and abortion should be avoided. But, when the benefits of the abortion is more valuable than the life of the fetus, it's ok!.
I am going to put my two cents in here. Paul says that a Christian should not leave a non-Christian unless the partner has been unfaithful. He also says that if the non-Christian asks for the divorce then the Christian is able to accept... otherwise if a Christian is married to a non-Christian they are to act and live in such a way that they are a witness.Another question ... if a woman is being abused by her husband and he hits her in the stomach, causing her to abort, who is liable? The husband for the hitting? Or the woman for not leaving someone she knows is an abuser?
I consider this abortion all the same. The mother should care for the child while it is inside the womb just as she will when it is outside. If I am not mistaken the bible even says that women should not drink in their prenatel state. I believe smoking is risky as well.What if a woman is a drug user and the fetus aborts?
I believe the woman has the ultimate right to care for the fetus. Because the fetus and later the baby is incapable of caring for itself the mother, and father, should take on that role. The babys right is to live a healthy and cared for life... a person gave it that right when they conceived it!And what does everyone think about the fact that it's ultimately a woman's problem. Men can go on blithely and ignore their children, but a woman is a mother forever. She risks death (yes, death) by carrying a child. Her body is permanently changed by carrying a child. Who has more "right" to make decisions for that fetus?
Just keep in mind.. it is either right or wrong. There in no "role playing" morality.Just some things to think about. Personally, I wouldn't have an abortion at this stage in my life. But in college, if I got too drunk and got pregnant, I probably would have seriously considered it, regardless of my religious beliefs.
all4one said:Just keep in mind.. it is either right or wrong. There in no "role playing" morality.
God bless you and your family,All4one said:Praise God for the understanding He has granted you sister. Regardless of what people think or who will follow the problems of this world only have one solution... Not money, not war.. God
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?