- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,210
- 52,660
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do you build Rube Goldberg machines as a hobby?Creationism + Discovery Institute + pseudoscientific buzzwords + political agenda - a shred of honesty or integrity = Intelligent Design
Do you build Rube Goldberg machines as a hobby?
No, it says that is the case for some, not all. And it refutes nothing. Your inability to understand an article does not mean that it refutes a concept.
Plutoing "Intelligent Design" to "pseudoscience," now are you?Creationism + Fatih = pseudoscience
Looks to me like someone can't tell the difference between ID and Creationism.Nope. Pseudoscience is ID/creationism/cdesign proponensists hook of death.
Plutoing "Intelligent Design" to "pseudoscience," now are you?
Trying to get Intelligent Design off the hook?
ID is science like evolution is science.Are you suggesting ID is science?
ID is science like evolution is science.
Um ...Neither could the Christian judge in the Dover trial.
The plaintiffs successfully argued that intelligent design is a form of creationism,
Um ...
SOURCE
Intelligent Design, as would Creationism, lost that trial because it was ruled that Intelligent Design is not science.
Something I've been saying for over a decade.
Wow.And now you are being inconsistent. Evolution is science and was found to be science in more than one court hearing by Christian judges.
Wow.
You guys love to yak yourself out of understanding things, don't you?
Either that, or you yak until a mistake is made, then the whole point is made into spaghetti.
Intelligent Design is not ... that is not ... en oh tee ... Intelligent Design is not Creationism.
Intelligent Design is an attempt ... an attempt ... a tee tee e em pee tee ... an attempt to inject some kind of science into Creationism.
Some judge ruled correctly that the science that was trying to be snuck into Creationism does not belong there.[/qoute]
No, that is not right. That was not what he ruled at all. Creationism is a myth, as we all know. They tried to disguise a myth and they were caught doing so.
Let's simplify this for Occam razor's sake, shall we?
Here it comes ... get ready:
Intelligent Design is not Creationism.
You already failed. You don't seem to understand how to use this tool either.
You can argue otherwise if you want to, but it doesn't make it so.
We don't just argue. We show that we are correct with valid evidence. I see that logic is still a tool missing from your toolbox.
I'll repeat the formula for those of you who are allergic to one-liners:
Creationism + Science = Intelligent Design
- or -
Creationism - Faith = Intelligent Design
Take your pick.
Creationism runs on faith.Get rid of "Science" and "Faith" in your claims and you would be correct.
Creationism runs on faith.
Is that why you're having trouble understanding?
Faith is getting in the way, isn't it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?