• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Intelligent Design and bat echolocation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mallon

Senior Veteran
Mar 6, 2006
6,109
297
✟30,402.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
A new finding came to light today which, once again, reminded me of why Intelligent Design is not just bad science, but bad theology, too.
A new species of fossil bat was just described in Nature, which, based on comparative anatomy, did not possess the ability to echolocate as living bats do today.
Now, Intelligent Design proponents have been arguing for years that echolocation is undoubtedly evidence for supernatural design, given its obvious complexity:
http://www.creationism.org/batman/bats.htm
http://www.idthefuture.com/2006/09/biological_design_research_the.html
http://www.watchtower.org/e/20030308/article_02.htm
So what does the existence of a bat incapable of echolocation therefore imply about the supposed Intelligent Designer? Maybe he isn't as intelligent as we thought. Maybe he doesn't even exist! These are the implications that inevitably stem from Intelligent Design theology, further demonstrating the god-of-the-gaps argument that it truly is. As Christians, we should all recognize the danger that ID theology imposes and drop it like a hot potato. We do not need stupid arguments like 'irreducible complexity' to convince us of the Creator's existence.
 

Mallon

Senior Veteran
Mar 6, 2006
6,109
297
✟30,402.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Of course, they lost the information after the Fall! This is an example of devolution, not evolution!

[/creationist]

:sorry:
And the fact that it was found in older sediments than all echolocating bats, as predicted by the theory of evolution, was just a coincidence, I'm sure! :D
 
Upvote 0

shernren

you are not reading this.
Feb 17, 2005
8,463
515
38
Shah Alam, Selangor
Visit site
✟33,881.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
In Relationship
And the fact that it was found in older sediments than all echolocating bats, as predicted by the theory of evolution, was just a coincidence, I'm sure! :D
No! You see, bats without echolocation are less mobile than bats with echolocation. Therefore, they were not as [Think caves. Dodgy Flood explanations for fossil segregation don't work!] capable of escaping the [Think caves. Dodgy Flood explanations for fossil segregation don't work!] Flood, and thus ended up in deeper sediments than bats with echolocation!

It all makes sense! I see the light now!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.