Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If you ask nicely, I'll consider it.Hey @FrumiousBandersnatch and @Ophiolite keep an eye on this discussion as your involvement will be required soon.
From dust to dust. you do realize everything doesn't fossilize? right?Where are the remains of all of your ancestors from Adam to you?
Heck, that is only about 300 generations!
So some are dust, and a few fossilized, and are still in the ground or found. And please think before you come back with your point.
I don't want to seem mean, but you really should do a little reading on non-creationist sites, as your assertions are really very silly and naive. And the Darwin eye thing? A great example of why you need to 'get out more.'Again, the evolution argument that it happened so it must be true. "Sexes would have evolved". How? It just did not happen.
Creatures without an immune system would perish. The only time an immune system is required is when there is a threat. Too late by then. Even Darwin knew that the eye was a difficulty for his evolution theory. With what we know now, it is not just difficult. Try impossible. Oh but the eye is there (sorry two identical eyes - how did that come about so conveniently?) so evolution must be true. You can get all the Omo in the world but it still won't wash.
How, exactly, is a direct quote from your post a "misquote"?OK, good, now you see there was much more to it than your misquote.
Calling a direct, complete quote along with a link a "misquote", in my book, is very much a lie.Tell you what go ahead and milk that for all it's worth, I really do understand the need however, you only posting part of the post was enough for me to call it a misquote. It's much like posting part of a story, and the result being as good as a lie, but technically it's not.
And does that help to back the evolution claim?↑
Yes, phylogenetically they are dinosaurs,
Of course they're rare....thank you.↑
Fossilization is very rare, accessible fossils are much rarer, and fossils that we have found are rarer still.
Are you on drugs or something? Do you maybe need to be on drugs?
I didn't only post part of it, I posted the entire thing. All of it. The whole thing. Then I posted it again because you didn't see it the first time, somehow. Then I high-lighted and addressed the problematic parts of it, namely the claims about there needing to be billions of fossils if evolution is true, which is a topic you seem to have abandoned altogether. To argue about being misquoted when you have repeatedly been quoted in your entirety.
"Body plan"? This is evolution, totally random, how can there be a plan?
There is no plausible reason why "body plans" should be so similar. Why not an ape with four arms?
Wyh not people with four or five eyes? You still don't tell my why an immune system would evolve before it knew that it needed one. In your world, all we would have is single celled or simple multicellular organisms. Everything else would succumb to an infection. The complexity of an immune system defies any explanation that evolution can answer, just like the vast majority of the amazing systems that make up life. Do you know how incredibly complex a single cell is? It is impossible for it to just be a mixture of proteins, lipids, amino acids and such. You can create something like it in a lab. Professor Tour will do that for you, presumably for a fee. What will spark a chemical cocktail into life? Miller theorised that lightning might have been the cause. I know how destructive lightning is. It is the last thing you want if you are trying to create life. There is no plausible mechanism apart from, "In the beginning, God created....."
"For example, let's take an ape or whatever it is you all think we evolved from, now where are the all but never ending amount of fossils that gradually turned into a man? IOW, if we find several ape fossils and several modern man fossils there would have to be tons of slowly evolving creatures fossils in between there, and for all intents and purposes, we might as well say there are none."
Amazing...
Close enough:
"But where are all the fossils that show the little legs before they got so little? Those several in between stages of shorter, shorter yet, and even shorter? Let's not conveniently forget about that. "
Oh, the irony.You're way behind here. Your first comment you deleted, the second said absolutely nothing useful, the 3rd (I think, hard to keep up with useless posts) a prayer (did you ask God to help me ignore what the bible tells us. lol) and now you are rehashing old arguments.
I think it's safe for me to skip reading the rest pf your posts without concern of missing anything.
If you ask nicely, I'll consider it.
What is it that you would accept as evidence for evolution? Is there anything?
You should probably take this to a new discussion thread, and leave off the specific users.Hey hey 46and2
Lets start with this one. Show me how the the Theory of Evolution is compatible with concept of The God of Abraham as Creator?
Cheers
You should probably take this to a new discussion thread, and leave off the specific users.
(If you only want to discuss it with 46and2, perhaps a private conversation system is the more appropriate medium),
I was interested in wiccan and such a decade or two ago, so the spelling's just stuck with me heh.
I understand the process, and how it works.
it's like throwing a million dice in the air in sets of 6's, then someone else deciding 26 is the right amount of those set of 6 and those are winners.
with antibiotic resistances, each bacteria mutates in various ways, when you apply antiobiotics those that randomly had the resistance survive,
it's just a natural part of how dna replicates that it's not perfect so makes mistakes that can be beneficial, neutral, or harmful. Beneficial have a more imediate benefit, neutral either mutate away or might later be beneficial, while harmful often don't survive very long so they get weeded out.
maybe you will do better then the others,
and I try not to question someones intelligence, though it can be a bit tough when you have the same old PRATT's coming up year after year,
most of them failing from the start because the one trying to refute evolution doesn't even have basic understandings of it.
And to be fair many creationists come off as condescending and rude as shown in your post.
I will admit though I do laugh at creationists at times,
but mostly because it's kinda funny to see you guys so self assured you have disproven evolution when you havn't even made a point that relates to it.
I was merely trying to point out that this is off topic for the thread at large and private person to person are discussions are discouraged on open threads.Hey hey my dear
Pass. 46and2 engaged me, perhaps you should express your concerns to him.
You want something from me my dear? ;p
Cheers
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?