Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Indisputable 911 coverup facts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="whatbogsends" data-source="post: 42791939" data-attributes="member: 11978"><p>The problem, BigCedar, is that when we point out flaws in the official version, and i personally have stated that it is clear that there was (a) some government foreknowledge and (b) evidence of coverup - those defending the OV spew the same ad homs and rhetoric that they do when arguing against "there was no plane" "truthers" - who are not the majority, or even a significant minority of those who doubt the official version of the events.</p><p> </p><p>When the people who've conducted the official investigation feel that they've been deceived (see the linked article in Daniel19's post), we can be reasonably sure that there was a deliberate cover up. What is very unclear, is whether that the purpose of the cover up is: to hide incompetence, to protect allies that may be involve, or even to hide (active or passive) complicity. Suggesting the possiblity of government complicity - and demanding that the real facts surrounding the event come to light - is a far cry from claiming that the government was behind 9/11. Finding the truth should be the goal of everyone on both sides of the debate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="whatbogsends, post: 42791939, member: 11978"] The problem, BigCedar, is that when we point out flaws in the official version, and i personally have stated that it is clear that there was (a) some government foreknowledge and (b) evidence of coverup - those defending the OV spew the same ad homs and rhetoric that they do when arguing against "there was no plane" "truthers" - who are not the majority, or even a significant minority of those who doubt the official version of the events. When the people who've conducted the official investigation feel that they've been deceived (see the linked article in Daniel19's post), we can be reasonably sure that there was a deliberate cover up. What is very unclear, is whether that the purpose of the cover up is: to hide incompetence, to protect allies that may be involve, or even to hide (active or passive) complicity. Suggesting the possiblity of government complicity - and demanding that the real facts surrounding the event come to light - is a far cry from claiming that the government was behind 9/11. Finding the truth should be the goal of everyone on both sides of the debate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Indisputable 911 coverup facts
Top
Bottom