Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Incorrect Assumptions of Past Similarities
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justatruthseeker" data-source="post: 73203017" data-attributes="member: 332164"><p>I'm sure, since you gave both DNA. Strawman to the extreme..... and completely tries to avoid and misdirect from my claim....</p><p></p><p>Now if you had the DNA of the claimed "missing" common ancestor to compare it to..... So claims of past relations millions of years ago....</p><p></p><p>Did that DNA tell you that you were related to someone just 4,000 years ago? Well did it? and do you believe it actually could?</p><p></p><p>If you do your deluding yourself.....</p><p></p><p>A test like that would show you were NOT related to a monkey.....</p><p></p><p>It's only when they snip genomes apart, take out what doesn't fit, realign things so they do, that similarity is claimed. Not on an actual DNA test, but just in aligned code after they cut it all up and made it fit. An actual DNA test as each stands as it is would show you are anything but related....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justatruthseeker, post: 73203017, member: 332164"] I'm sure, since you gave both DNA. Strawman to the extreme..... and completely tries to avoid and misdirect from my claim.... Now if you had the DNA of the claimed "missing" common ancestor to compare it to..... So claims of past relations millions of years ago.... Did that DNA tell you that you were related to someone just 4,000 years ago? Well did it? and do you believe it actually could? If you do your deluding yourself..... A test like that would show you were NOT related to a monkey..... It's only when they snip genomes apart, take out what doesn't fit, realign things so they do, that similarity is claimed. Not on an actual DNA test, but just in aligned code after they cut it all up and made it fit. An actual DNA test as each stands as it is would show you are anything but related.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Incorrect Assumptions of Past Similarities
Top
Bottom