Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Incorrect Assumptions of Past Similarities
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justatruthseeker" data-source="post: 73198939" data-attributes="member: 332164"><p>1. I know, mutation has little to do with it...</p><p></p><p>2. And they remain the same kind. Just as bacteria remain bacteria, fruit flies remain fruit flies and dogs remain dogs...... stop trying to imply that horizontal variation means evolution.....</p><p></p><p>3. Because their is nothing rational or scientific in could be, maybe, and millions of years arguments that don’t match what we observe......</p><p></p><p></p><p>No change is no change.</p><p></p><p></p><p>No, as mutations degrade the genome less variability is available for breeding to work with. That’s why they have all but abandoned mutation in plant and animal husbandry...</p><p></p><p></p><p>Says the person that thinks a genome today contains millions of years of history. When if a mutation were to change something, what it was before would be impossible to deduce being the change was random....</p><p></p><p></p><p>I know, there is no evidence there is any...</p><p></p><p></p><p>Pity you keep having to refer to millions of years because nothing in reality supports your claims......</p><p></p><p>I’d look in the mirror first when uttering those words about being affected by the Dunning-Kruger effect. You’ll be able to see it first hand.....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justatruthseeker, post: 73198939, member: 332164"] 1. I know, mutation has little to do with it... 2. And they remain the same kind. Just as bacteria remain bacteria, fruit flies remain fruit flies and dogs remain dogs...... stop trying to imply that horizontal variation means evolution..... 3. Because their is nothing rational or scientific in could be, maybe, and millions of years arguments that don’t match what we observe...... No change is no change. No, as mutations degrade the genome less variability is available for breeding to work with. That’s why they have all but abandoned mutation in plant and animal husbandry... Says the person that thinks a genome today contains millions of years of history. When if a mutation were to change something, what it was before would be impossible to deduce being the change was random.... I know, there is no evidence there is any... Pity you keep having to refer to millions of years because nothing in reality supports your claims...... I’d look in the mirror first when uttering those words about being affected by the Dunning-Kruger effect. You’ll be able to see it first hand..... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Incorrect Assumptions of Past Similarities
Top
Bottom