Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
In the mating game, first impressions count most
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gottservant" data-source="post: 74723308" data-attributes="member: 158134"><p>Let's focus on just this: I said "Without the forbidden fruit, no one would ever have developed the theory of Evolution?"</p><p></p><p>You said:</p><p></p><p></p><p>Do you see how your answer, effectively short changes God?</p><p></p><p>I mean here you have a Creator, who creates a world, puts forbidden fruit in it and in the event that the forbidden fruit is abused, He sends His Son to pay the price for all those negatively affected by the consumption (of the forbidden fruit) and people who for all intents and purposes should be rejoicing that they don't have to die as well, simply say "no comment"?</p><p></p><p>Then I come along and say "well, even if you don't believe in God creating, at least offer your perspective on the efficacy of design in the mating ritual?" and your answer is again "no comment"?</p><p></p><p>And I am to understand that if I develop an extension of Evolution that applies specifically to humans, I will again get the answer "no comment"??</p><p></p><p>It wouldn't even be a problem that your theory was partial or less effective than thought, but you don't even try to assess one aspect of Creation in relation to another, with the hope that God will reveal something - as though, you in your absence of belief are still more committed than you would be if you gave to charity just as much, for example???</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gottservant, post: 74723308, member: 158134"] Let's focus on just this: I said "Without the forbidden fruit, no one would ever have developed the theory of Evolution?" You said: Do you see how your answer, effectively short changes God? I mean here you have a Creator, who creates a world, puts forbidden fruit in it and in the event that the forbidden fruit is abused, He sends His Son to pay the price for all those negatively affected by the consumption (of the forbidden fruit) and people who for all intents and purposes should be rejoicing that they don't have to die as well, simply say "no comment"? Then I come along and say "well, even if you don't believe in God creating, at least offer your perspective on the efficacy of design in the mating ritual?" and your answer is again "no comment"? And I am to understand that if I develop an extension of Evolution that applies specifically to humans, I will again get the answer "no comment"?? It wouldn't even be a problem that your theory was partial or less effective than thought, but you don't even try to assess one aspect of Creation in relation to another, with the hope that God will reveal something - as though, you in your absence of belief are still more committed than you would be if you gave to charity just as much, for example??? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
In the mating game, first impressions count most
Top
Bottom