- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,435
- 52,723
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Last Thursdayism is "maturity with history."
Embedded Age is "maturity without history."
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Last Thursdayism is "maturity with history."Last Thursdayism. You are essentially saying that everything in the past 6,000 years is embedded as well.
That's the best I could do at the moment in presenting something that only looks old, but without age.That does not suggest an apparent age.
An example would be a 12 year old girl who looks 21?That's the best I could do at the moment in presenting something that only looks old, but without age.
That's the best I could do at the moment in presenting something that only looks old, but without age.
* cough *Let's just leave it at that, we both understand what the other is saying.
None.RickG said:What physical evidence is there to suggest apparent age?
Let's hope RickG gets it.Well there you have it.
I think he does, hence......
Is the any reason that the original readers/hearers of Genesis woukd think creation was anything other than six days? At face value, is that what it says? Keep in mind before you reply that they already had the Ten Commandments.The bottom line is whether "apparent" or "embedded" age, both suggest God to be a deceiver.
Translation:The bottom line is whether "apparent" or "embedded" age, both suggest God to be a deceiver.
What happened to God?But this has nothing to do with Rick, AV, HitchSlap, or anybody else,
Gen 1:2 states that God said let there be light. Then later on it says that God created the Sun on day four.
If you want to claim that this is just my interpretation of the bible, then so be it. But I'm not sure how else to interpret it. It seems fairly strait forward, even if you disbelieve it.
No.
It contains embedded age that has been in existence for 6000 years.
You keep assuming I'm using terms that I'm not using. I never said anything about proof. I asked if it was possible that this conclusion is incorrect. In other words, is it possible that later evidence could arise that would change this conclusion?
You are still arguing against something I'm not arguing for. I'm not saying that the Sun isn't necessary for us, it that it doesn't give off light. All I'm saying is that it's not necessary for light. I have no doubt that God can create light apart from the Sun.
But let's assume that the light on Day 1 was just enlightenment,
Last Thursdayism is "maturity with history."
Embedded Age is "maturity without history."
That's the best I could do at the moment in presenting something that only looks old, but without age.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?