Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I only quoted one sentence. That's the part.
No, it's made up.That's not made up. It's the truth.
No, it's made up.
I've read your posts, and it might be the "truth" for you. But that's only because you absolutely refuse to learn, no matter how much evidence, no matter how many facts, are placed in front of you, I suppose because you are afraid that if you believe even one small piece, you will be tortured for all eternity. Very sad.
The resolution of the issue is very simple. Offer evidence, based on the scientific method, for only naturalistic mechansims producing humanity, as well as all life we observe today, from an alleged single life form of long ago.
Now I expect your response to offer anything but what I've requested. Excuses will be made, evasion may be seen, personal attacks could be forthcoming, even an attempt to change the issue to common ancestry may be tried....but what we will not see is the evidence asked for. That's because it doesn't exist.
First, you are the one who made the assertions, so you are the one is responsible for providing evidence.
Second, as I said, I've read your posts. Davian, Subduction Zone, and others have given you reams of evidence, and you simply refuse to accept any of it, and just make stuff up, as you did in the sentence I quoted. Even your own bible talks about people like you: Jeremiah 5:21 ‘Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not’.
So thanks, but I won't bother embarking on such a pointless journey.
That's because the scientific theory of evolution cannot explain the human spirit.Then there is nothing that the scientific theory of evolution needs to explain.
As allowed in the context of this forum.Discussion by cartoon.
Indeed. I think everyone here is clear on how unfamiliar you are with the science involved.Then move it to another section of forum. Stop attempting to introduce off-topic issues.
I've explained several times now (as in my last post) that I used the term 'scientific truth' in contrast with the guesses and suppositions of Darwinist evolution. Darwinist evolution discards scientific truth and embraces willy-nilly creation unsupported by the scientific method.
..or red herrings...And that my friend is an example of how you stay on-topic.
As soon as you somehow, someway, with your best effort actually introduce content in which Newtonian physics
How about your word usage here in this forum?is related to creationism...or evolution (the topics of the forum), I'll be glad to discuss whatever it is you're wanting to discuss.
Well, I wouldn't refer to yourself as a nobody, but I still wonder why you are so evasive.Currently, nobody has a clue what you're trying to say.
As allowed in the context of this forum.
Indeed. I think everyone here is clear on how unfamiliar you are with the science involved.
..or red herrings...
How about your word usage here in this forum?
Well, I wouldn't refer to yourself as a nobody, but I still wonder why you are so evasive.
Let's make the example more generic: If you have two scientific truths, where one yields slightly more accurate predictions than the other, are they still both scientific truths?
Me too, whenever I feel it appropriate.Could be, I don't know. I know I'm going to participate in discussion by cartoon.
Exactly the sort of thing to say when you cannot address the science involved. No need to go on.That's the point, there's no scientific evidence involved, based on the scientific method, for the claim that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity, as well as all life forms we observe today, from an alleged single life form of long ago. The view is nothing more than a faith-based view.
Each time you suggest that your word usage in this forum is off topic for this forum.Where?
Point out where I made a claim that required such. Perhaps you have confused me with someone else again.How about your complete and total failure to provide the evidence asked for?
A little slow on the uptake today? As I said in my previous post, let's make the example generic, so that it can apply to this - or any - science forum: If you have two scientific truths, where one yields slightly more accurate predictions than the other, are they still both scientific truths?I wonder why you can't discuss the issues on-topic. Well......not really.
I doubt you're going to actually tell us how that's related to creation and/or evolution.
Me too, whenever I feel it appropriate.
Exactly the sort of thing to say when you cannot address the science involved. No need to go on.
Each time you suggest that your word usage in this forum is off topic for this forum.
Point out where I made a claim that required such. Perhaps you have confused me with someone else again.
A little slow on the uptake today? As I said in my previous post, let's make the example generic, so that it can apply to this - or any - science forum: If you have two scientific truths, where one yields slightly more accurate predictions than the other, are they still both scientific truths?
I will understand if this question makes you uncomfortable, and you must again obfuscate. Don't you have some sort of relationship with an allegedly all-knowing something-or-other that you can appeal to get just the right answer to deal with this, or the other science in this forum? No?
Not to these forums.Your discussion by cartoon would certainly be unique.
Nothing that you are able to falsify, it seems.There is no science, supported by the scientific method, involved.
Yet you refuse to discuss your word usage, even with a generic example.Unless you consider your cartoon to be scientific evidence of course.
My word usage isn't off-topic, your Newtonian physics is the attempt at off-topic discussion.
So you do have me confused with someone else again. I have made no such claim. I have never seen anyone make such a claim in these forums.I asked for evidence, based on the scientific method, for the view that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity, as well as all life we observe today, from an alleged single life form of long ago. You've utterly failed to offer evidence, based on the scientific method, for such a view.
It never ceases to amaze me to see religionists use their own nomenclature in the pejorative.It's nothing more than a faith-based view.
I did not think you had any such relationship.How about actually addressing creation and evolution? That would be a great start for you.
That's because the scientific theory of evolution cannot explain the human spirit.
You cannot claim that humans evolved from apes while ignoring a fundamental element of human nature.
It's not possible for a human spirit to evolve from an ape.
Because evolution does not explain the origin of the human spirit.
*For who among men knows the thoughts of a man except the man's spirit within him? In the same way no one knows the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God.* -- (1 Cor 2:11-12).
It is the human spirit that empowers us with human life, consciousness and intelligence, just as God's Spirit empowers us with divine life, consciousness and intelligence.
It is not possible for apes and monkeys to evolve a human spirit.
The human spirit is a gift from God just as God's Spirit is.
My faith-based belief is that humans came from the creator, God.
Please explain how 'humans came from the creator, God.' ?
Not to these forums.
Nothing that you are able to falsify, it seems.
Yet you refuse to discuss your word usage, even with a generic example.
So you do have me confused with someone else again. I have made no such claim. I have never seen anyone make such a claim in these forums.
It never ceases to amaze me to see religionists use their own nomenclature in the pejorative.
My other point was that my teenagers did not believe me when I told them about how evasive a religionist could be in these matters, so this provided an appropriate demonstration. Thanks for your participation.
Merry Christmas!
I'm not God therefore I can't explain the process. It's far beyond human ability to create humans therefore it remains a mystery.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?