Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So if you think people believed the Earth was flat back when. Well I can't say what people thought. I was not there back then. However my grand kids say I am old as dirt. I know what God said.
TWO CARTOONS?!?! IN A ROW!Your sig is another image. I suggest folks check out the post if they're interested in seeing a post of cartoons.
It applies directly to your use of the phrase "scientific truth". Seriously, what have you got to loose? Are you afraid that it might reduce your credibility in this forum?Of course I'm not going to answer, your question is off-topic. You could possibly explain how it's on-topic, but I doubt it.
Well that's a nice job of avoiding the issue, the old Ken Ham "Were you there?" defense. But by your own logic, nobody was there when God created everything, so you can have no idea if it happened that way or not. Hung on your own petard.
TWO CARTOONS?!?! IN A ROW!
I'll alert the media.
It applies directly to your use of the phrase "scientific truth". Seriously, what have you got to loose? Are you afraid that it might reduce your credibility in this forum?
Answer the question: Are Newtonian physics a scientific truth?
This is actually directed at your method of discussion.Nah, no sense in doing that. Just note your method of discussion.
It is not off-topic. It applies directly to your use of the phrase "scientific truth". Are you uncomfortable discussing your word usage here?Anytime you wish to include it in a discussion of creation and/or evolution, I'll be glad to respond. Trying to go off-topic isn't going to work.
This is actually directed at your method of discussion.
It is not off-topic. It applies directly to your use of the phrase "scientific truth". Are you uncomfortable discussing your word usage here?
Answer the question: Are Newtonian physics a scientific truth?
Are you unsure?
Ah, yes, where I flooded the thread with... an image. I did not realize that it would be so traumatic for you.I'm not the one attempting discussion by cartoon, you are.
I did explain: It applies directly to your use of the phrase "scientific truth". Are you uncomfortable discussing your word usage here?Explain how it's related to the topic of the room, creation and evolution. Otherwise, I'm not going to participate in your off-topic effort.
Ah, yes, where I flooded the thread with... an image. I did not realize that it would be so traumatic for you.
I did explain: It applies directly to your use of the phrase "scientific truth". Are you uncomfortable discussing your word usage here?
Answer the question: Are Newtonian physics a scientific truth?
No, but your dramatic claim of that one image becoming a "walls of cartoons" had that appearance.Cartoon discussion was your choice. My not responding in kind wasn't an indicator of trauma.
I did explain: It applies directly to your use of the phrase "scientific truth". All you need to do is answer this question, if you can: Are Newtonian physics a scientific truth?My use of the phrase 'scientific truth' was in reference to the claims of Darwinist evolution. The 'how' of Darwinist evolution isn't based on scientific truth but on guesses and suppositions.
Now, explain how Newtonian physics are related to the topic of the forum, creation and evolution? Try to stay on-topic, please.
Ok, its clear you have thought things through and we each have made our choice. I don't agree but I won't be disagreeable. better to leave in peace than belittle each persons choice. Peace in this holiday season to you.
The phrase is actually 'hoist with your own petard'. It means literally, 'blown up by your own bomb'.Hung on your own petard.
Doh! Thanks.The phrase is actually 'hoist with your own petard'. It means literally, 'blown up by your own bomb'.
The Bible does not agree with evolution. God used a literal six days. The bible has existed so much longer that this new religion of evolution.
No, but your dramatic claim of that one image becoming a "walls of cartoons" had that appearance.
I did explain: It applies directly to your use of the phrase "scientific truth".
All you need to do is answer this question, if you can: Are Newtonian physics a scientific truth?
I got to wondering, Justlookinla, what theory do you put I place of evolution. Where do you think humans came from? Evocation is out with you. I sense also creatio ex nihilo. So just what is your scientific explanation for where we came from ?
What was obvious?I was simply pointing out the obvious
This is not about how Newtonian physics are related to creation and evolution, but your use of the phrase "scientific truth". Do you get a bulk discount on red herrings?My comment on 'scientific truth' was directly related to the guesses and suppositions of Darwinism. That's how one stays on topic in the forum.
All you need to do is explain how Newtonian physics are related to creation and evolution.
What was obvious?
This is not about how Newtonian physics are related to creation and evolution,
but your use of the phrase "scientific truth". Do you get a bulk discount on red herrings?
I ask the question, to illustrate a point: Are Newtonian physics a scientific truth?
Even if you don't answer, the evasive circles you run in are fascinating to observe.
Darwinist evolution discards scientific truth and embraces willy-nilly creation unsupported by the scientific method.
Now you're just making stuff up. Not that you weren't before, but the above really stands out.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?