- Jan 10, 2010
- 37,281
- 8,501
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
A sketch of a mammal looks like a mammal too.
Do we really need to discuss the difference?
Not sure I agree.It's still an arbitrary classification system.
Because evolution does not explain the origin of the human spirit.So let's try this in reverse: Why Are You Not An Evolutionist?
Because evolution does not explain the origin of the human spirit.
*For who among men knows the thoughts of a man except the man's spirit within him? In the same way no one knows the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God.* -- (1 Cor 2:11-12).
It is the human spirit that empowers us with human life, consciousness and intelligence, just as God's Spirit empowers us with divine life, consciousness and intelligence.
It is not possible for apes and monkeys to evolve a human spirit.
The human spirit is a gift from God just as God's Spirit is.
Why would evolution need to explain the origin of the human spirit? It's like saying that you reject germ theory because it doesn't explain the origin of disco.
what on Earth ? loudmouth are you sure your not a YEC ? your logics is quite similar.
Dovemen is saying there is a spiritual dimension aspect to man. There is quite a lot of evidence for that fact.
not really, the mariana trench is huge.But remember:
It was a miracle the trench was brought to them in the first place.
Well you want to have it both ways don't you ?
There is millions of anecdotal evidence for God and the nature of man.
But a lot of Evolution is an unobserved science (cough conjecture )
Yet you spout every thing as if it was observed proven science and it just isn't.
Do you post snippets like that just so parts of your post will be right?
That was back in the 1890's, was it not? Well, science has made a bit of progress since then. You better get to the wiki page and update with your knowledge.
So you do think that the latest in evolutionary theory is correct. It has taken you a long time to come around. Good to see it though.
You just said it was the latest scientific truth. I can go with that. With new evidence they will update it as needed. I do not have a problem with that either.We don't know if the latest in the Darwinist view is correct or not. It may be time for Neo-Neo Darwinism. Then follows Neo-Neo-Neo Darwinism. It's certainly not something one should place their faith in, even though there are many who embrace the faith-based view of Darwinist creationism.
You just said it was the latest scientific truth. I can go with that. With new evidence they will update it as needed. I do not have a problem with that either.
Okay.You'll then embrace the new truth, until another new truth is presented...and on and on and on.
Or, simply had a lower degree of accuracy.Of course that means that the 'truth' you previously embraced was a lie.
How do you know? You are the one calling it the truth.You never know when it's truth or a lie.
Okay.
Or, simply had a lower degree of accuracy.
How do you know? You are the one calling it the truth.
The people working and studying in the field of evolutionary theory. Are you new to this?Who knows?
The state of being true. I do not dispute that. That is what you called it.I should have said 'truth'.
Lie implies purposeful deception, which is not what happens in science when it is done to code. Typically, those "new truths" are just updated versions of the old ones, with new information we previously did not have added.You'll then embrace the new truth, until another new truth is presented...and on and on and on. Of course that means that the 'truth' you previously embraced was a lie. You never know when it's truth or a lie.
The people working and studying in the field of evolutionary theory. Are you new to this?
The state of being true. I do not dispute that. That is what you called it.
Lie implies purposeful deception, which is not what happens in science when it is done to code. Typically, those "new truths" are just updated versions of the old ones, with new information we previously did not have added.
Ya ... I used to live near it.not really, the mariana trench is huge.
Better to trust a new thing that appears, based on all the evidence, to be factual, than to trust something that contradicts itself.We really can't trust the new 'truths' then, can we? Who knows how long they'll be 'true'?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?