Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Hmmm ... sounds to me like someone is bias.
Ain't seen my thread ... yet it's "bunk."
Interesting.
That's not the impression I get from reading about the Cambrian Explosion. They still haven't sorted that out.
Well your impression is wrong.
They should update their information to reflect this.
Maybe you should read actual scientific sources.
Aren't the ones on the internet valid sources?
That's a subtle trick of the Devil.Which sources are you reading that say "critters suddenly appeared in the fossil record with no evidence of evolution"?
That's a subtle trick of the Devil.
As soon as someone disagrees with your statement, then you can come back with: "But isn't your father a link in the chain between you and your grandfather?"
In other words, you can recuse to microevolution the minute someone says macroevolution can take a hike.
That bologna example academians use about taking baby steps from Point A to Point B across the country is ... well ... bologna.
Neither would a deist god, would he?... I really don't care.
Which sources are you reading that say "critters suddenly appeared in the fossil record with no evidence of evolution"?
Because if any of the ones you read say that (or thereabouts), they aren't actual scientific sources.
Neither would a deist god, would he?
What's his name, by the way?
Jehovah?
If so, how do you know ... since he didn't stick around long enough to inspire anyone to write his biography?
Many articles say this, maybe not in the same words.
"No," what?No, I just don't care about what you think about evolution.
"No," what?
"No" a deist god wouldn't care?
Or "no," his name isn't Jehovah?
In either case, I totally agree.
Okay.No, as in the opposite to yes.
This is the OP:
"If you do not purge the old, how can the new take hold? If you do not make allowances for the new, where can the new find root??"
Just focus on part of it: "if you do not purge the old, how..." how? In other words, where is the evidence that you are preparing for a transition? Where is the momentum, that will carry the change through?
I think if you ignore this, you are in danger of becoming "a jack of all trades, and a master of none"?
Do you see that the old has to be purged? That you are claiming there is a process, which begins with one thing, and ends with another?
You might say "better to be a jack of all trades and evolve, than harp on about how exclusive evolution has to be to work", but you are borrowing against the response to evolution in order to prove it.
Which sources are you reading that say "critters suddenly appeared in the fossil record with no evidence of evolution"?
Because if any of the ones you read say that (or thereabouts), they aren't actual scientific sources.
Just bear with me for a second.
Say something evolves. Then it has a child. Then that child dies, but resurrects twice. Then one of those two resurrections, dies.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?