- Feb 4, 2006
- 46,773
- 10,977
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, you say that the weight of evidence favours purposeful creation, and yet you have never once shown any evidence for creation, at all.
No, you don't. If you really did then you would put in the work required to understand it to the depth you demand. You won't put in that work for yourself, so I am assuredly not going to put in that effort for you, only to have it ignored by you and to have serious answers treated with contempt.
We're done.
Study of anatomy confirms creation.
So you say. But you've not once presented any way to prove you right or to actually show creation.
You really should be more honest and just admit "My study of anatomy confirms creation for me".
Isn't that who we're trying to convince?
Quit your immature goading. You know perfectly well that is not what I am doing.
... what?
You are saying that if I study it long enough and hard enough I'll have to believe it. But nothing I've read comes close to answering my questions.
I accept that anatomy confirms creation to me only. I'm not concerned with what others believe.
Come on. Now you are just deliberately goading. I gave a detailed explanation as to why your study would not you require to believe the theory. Frankly, if you can't be bothered to read what I write, or if you choose to pretend I didn't say it, then your goading has worked. I won't waste any more breath dealing with your snide ignorance.You are saying that if I study it long enough and hard enough I'll have to believe it. But nothing I've read comes close to answering my questions.
Come on. Now you are just deliberately goading. I gave a detailed explanation as to why your study would not you require to believe the theory. Frankly, if you can't be bothered to read what I write, or if you choose to pretend I didn't say it, then your goading has worked. I won't waste any more breath dealing with your snide ignorance.
Would you like to see my fps challenge, where I try to get an honest academic to admit the fossil record shows instant arrival of genera?So you say. But you've not once presented any way to prove you right or to actually show creation.
You really should be more honest and just admit "My study of anatomy confirms creation for me".
Would you like to see my fps challenge, where I try to get an honest academic to admit the fossil record shows instant arrival of genera?
Didn't think so.Not interested in the slightest.
Didn't think so.
No, it's because your challenges are bunk.
Isn't it true that many critters appeared suddenly in the fossil record with no evidence of evolutionary ancestors? Isn't T-Rex one? Just asking.
Would you like to see my fps challenge, where I try to get an honest academic to admit the fossil record shows instant arrival of genera?
Not interested in the slightest.
Didn't think so.
No, it's because your challenges are bunk.
Not at all. You've been told this many times now.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?