Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
If you could do one thing and you would face no consequences...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Skaloop" data-source="post: 58623948" data-attributes="member: 148393"><p>OK, can an eternal thing have a beginning? Can an eternal universe have started with a big bang?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why? Human observation of the night sky is within a window of a few hundred thousand years. Recordings of such is much less still. So there's a limited number of light-producing bodies that would fall within that window. Anything fore or aft of that window wouldn't be observed.</p><p></p><p>Like you said, there are people smarter (or at least better informed on the matter) than either of us, and some of them disagree with me. But some of them disagree with you. But certainly, speaking as laypeople, we should be able to articulate our views, even if they aren't up to snuff with the experts. Basically, I'm looking for your explanation of why there should be more light than we see.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Skaloop, post: 58623948, member: 148393"] OK, can an eternal thing have a beginning? Can an eternal universe have started with a big bang? Why? Human observation of the night sky is within a window of a few hundred thousand years. Recordings of such is much less still. So there's a limited number of light-producing bodies that would fall within that window. Anything fore or aft of that window wouldn't be observed. Like you said, there are people smarter (or at least better informed on the matter) than either of us, and some of them disagree with me. But some of them disagree with you. But certainly, speaking as laypeople, we should be able to articulate our views, even if they aren't up to snuff with the experts. Basically, I'm looking for your explanation of why there should be more light than we see. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
If you could do one thing and you would face no consequences...
Top
Bottom