Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This sentence doesn't make sense to me... what are you trying to say???
If gravity is true, should we be throwing people off of tall buildings?
And God will take that into account at the Judgment.There are literally people born incapable of telling right from wrong to various degrees with otherwise normal thought processes. And a number of disorders are associated with it. There is not a single personality trait that all humans are born with.
If it could be shown that throwing people off tall buildings was the only way to ensure that gravity remained gravity?
You seem to be suggesting that Evolution is a law, but a law has an effect - I have never heard Evolution described as having an effect, only a translation between equivalents.
For example, you might say "Evolution produces human beings" then you could say it was a law,
And God will take that into account at the Judgment.
Have you ever heard of the "Age of Accountability"?
40% of the Ten Commandments, which you say 'is not a lot,' is enough to get scientists to bark about having the Ten Commandments removed from public property.
And why do they want them removed?
I think you forget who you're asking this question to.What will Zeus take into account?
Scientsts? I would think that there are plenty of christian scientists who have no problem with the Ten Commandments on government property. What does that have to do with science?
I think you forget who you're asking this question to.
That makes zero sense.
Why would I say that? I have never said that Evolution must produce humans any more than I said erosion must produce the Grand Canyon.
Wait for it...
And this is precisely the problem, the evidence is that erosion did cause the Grand Canyon,
That's how law works.
Just because erosion did cause the Grand Canyon is not evidence that it HAD TO create the Grand Canyon. If the starting conditions were different, then there would be no Grand Canyon.
In Europe, there is no Grand Canyon. If erosion must cause the Grand Canyon, and erosion occurs in Europe, then why isn't there a Grand Canyon in Europe?
Apparently, you don't understand how laws work. The interaction of laws will have different outcomes based on starting conditions and random changes along the way.
I said Grand Canyon Erosion, not erosion in general.
I said erosion in general.
"I have never said that Evolution must produce humans any more than I said erosion must produce the Grand Canyon."
We are discussing Law, not what you think you said.
If Erosion is a law, then why isn't there a Grand Canyon in Europe?
Maybe the Grand Canyon wasn't formed by erosion?
Maybe you could reference facts instead of stories you make up?
I made that up, did I?
You have made up a story about God making a serpentine path for rivers in order to ignore the overwhelming evidence for a million year history of canyon making.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?