Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Are you refering to the hydrogen bonds between the base pairs that hold the two strands together?Anyway, The DNA pull was much stronger then.
Sometimes I just get so offended for God, when I read the things you all write. Which really is not at all fair, as you don't believe in him, and so, are doing or saying nothing wrong.
Think it feels like, if someone dis-respects a member of your family. It's just not nice to hear at all.
Anyway, The DNA pull was much stronger then. Hence the reason it is Devolution as opposed to Evolution.
There were only 7 roos to my knowledge, so of course they are all going to go in the same direction. They live in families, just like most animals.
I believe if you count the generations back (I'm trusting someone elses word here) The population of the world is just about bang on, to have originated from just eight people breeding.
Like I often say, I have little knowledge, I just know what I believe.
I believe someday it will all be revealed.
You are on a discussion and debate forum. You are allowed to say whatever you like on a matter, but on such a forum it seems quite strange to not expect a response.Blayz, I've not read anything that you have written ,that smacks of much intelligence. So, people in glass houses and all that.
I don't understand why people on here are not allowed to say their take on a matter.
I've read all responses. I can see why you would find Blayz' response rude, but I frankly don't find any of the other posters rude. In fact, I think their posts are quite polite. They do call attention to the fact that you do not have a lot of knowledge on biology, but without being insulting, this is just a true statement. Some have asked you how you can say to know the truth while you know so little of the things you say to know the truth about. I think that's quite a pertinant question, don't you think?It seems to me, if something someone says is not to your liking, insulting their intelligence is your usual move, and I hate retoring back with it, but you are all so rude. If you wish to make a point, then by all means do so. Please however, leave out the rudeness, there is no need for it.
Not all of those responding are christians. Frumious Bandersnatch is a christian.Why are you all on a Christian forum anyway? I don't get it.
You are allowed to say whatever you want but this is a debate board. When you say something that is obviously wrong you can expect people to debate it.Blayz, I've not read anything that you have written ,that smacks of much intelligence. So, people in glass houses and all that.
I don't understand why people on here are not allowed to say their take on a matter.
It is not your intelligence that is the problem it is your self admitted lack of knowlede.It seems to me, if something someone says is not to your liking, insulting their intelligence is your usual move, and I hate retoring back with it, but you are all so rude.
It becomes difficult not to be rude when refuting an obviously wrong claim for the 50th time but I suppose we should try harder to be civil.If you wish to make a point, then by all means do so. Please however, leave out the rudeness, there is no need for it.
If you think that none of the people who realize that the flood of Noah was not global are Christians you are very mistaken. Check out Answers in Creation or the Affiliation of Chrstian Geologists for example.Why are you all on a Christian forum anyway? I don't get it.
I don't understand why people on here are not allowed to say their take on a matter.
It seems to me, if something someone says is not to your liking, insulting their intelligence is your usual move, and I hate retoring back with it, but you are all so rude.
Why are you all on a Christian forum anyway? I don't get it.
I said professional creationists. People from organisations like answers in genesis, the discovery institute or the institute for creation research.Tomk80 It is true, sciences were never my subject, that's why I ended up being an accountant.
However, the sciences were my late Grandfathers, who indeed lectured at Heriot Watt university most of his adult life, on the sciences, and Math.
My grandfather was a "Creationist" and I can assure you, he was not a lying bastard, scumbag, or quack.
Tomk80 It is true, sciences were never my subject, that's why I ended up being an accountant.
However, the sciences were my late Grandfathers, who indeed lectured at Heriot Watt university most of his adult life, on the sciences, and Math.
My grandfather was a "Creationist" and I can assure you, he was not a lying bastard, scumbag, or quack.
In 87 years of life, he never took a penny off of any one for proclaiming the Gospel. Anything that he ever said, to his knowledge, it was the whole truth.
A more devout, loving, sincere person you would be hard pushed to find. So please do not place all Creationists in the little box you have created for them.
List of reasons why Noah and his family could not have possibly repopulated the entire planet.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_genetic_disorders
thats only because mating is not based on good gens anymore (except for good looks), and because bad genes are kept alive through medical science.
In the words of Richard Dawkins:Tomk80 It is true, sciences were never my subject, that's why I ended up being an accountant.
However, the sciences were my late Grandfathers, who indeed lectured at Heriot Watt university most of his adult life, on the sciences, and Math.
My grandfather was a "Creationist" and I can assure you, he was not a lying bastard, scumbag, or quack.
In 87 years of life, he never took a penny off of any one for proclaiming the Gospel. Anything that he ever said, to his knowledge, it was the whole truth.
A more devout, loving, sincere person you would be hard pushed to find. So please do not place all Creationists in the little box you have created for them.
Such sentiments derive from the fact that the evidence for evolution is so vast and the concept is so central to the modern understanding of biology that it is inconcievable how any but a stubborn review or willful ignorance of the subject can result in disbelief. And this is in fact an observation of most people involved in this debate from the evolution side. Those opposed to evolution, without exception, display ignorance of science or evolutionary theory in some fundimental way.[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]It is absolutely safe to say that, if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid or insane[/FONT]
Tomk80 It is true, sciences were never my subject, that's why I ended up being an accountant.
However, the sciences were my late Grandfathers, who indeed lectured at Heriot Watt university most of his adult life, on the sciences, and Math.
My grandfather was a "Creationist" and I can assure you, he was not a lying bastard, scumbag, or quack.
In 87 years of life, he never took a penny off of any one for proclaiming the Gospel. Anything that he ever said, to his knowledge, it was the whole truth.
A more devout, loving, sincere person you would be hard pushed to find. So please do not place all Creationists in the little box you have created for them.
Dawkins said:[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]It is absolutely safe to say that, if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid or insane
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?