- Dec 31, 2016
- 7,221
- 3,311
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
I guess so, but your body of evidece has more holes in it than the Bismarck.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I guess so, but your body of evidece has more holes in it than the Bismarck.Except that there's evidence to support what I think and only claims for what you think. Big world of difference.
I guess so, but your body of evidece has more holes in it than the Bismarck.
Your claim was, "one story and a consistent message". Nothing about graves; smells like moving the goalposts...Which other one involves an empty grave and we'll discuss it.
Sounds like semantic quibbling. Humans have always been human by definition, but that doesn't mean that a population of humans cannot have evolved from proto-humans. But if you ask whether the ancestral lineage of humans has always been human, the answer is no.Back to the dumb accusations I guess. You just think humans had to split off something else, yet humans have always been human. I think humans have always been human and were created as such... what's so dumb about that?
Really?I guess so, but your body of evidece has more holes in it than the Bismarck.
Genesis to Revelation is a consistent story of how sin entered the world, how it played-out through various stories, and how God provided us a way to be saved from the consequences of sin in hell through His Son who died and rose again. All we need do is repent and receive Him as our personal Savior. So, you see Jesus’ empty tomb and His resurrection is the climax of the story.Your claim was, "one story and a consistent message". Nothing about graves; smells like moving the goalposts...
Well put... back at you regarding the Bible.To those who don't take the time to actually study it, nor approach it in good faith, maybe.
Well put... back at you regarding the Bible.
That's good enough for me.... it's not possible to say that any one individual is human but had parents that were not human.
Au contraire, how many times have I stated that I think evolution takes place, just not to the extent you do???Au contraire, I am willing to approach the Bible in good faith when it comes to it being treated as it should be: a religious text.
It's when it's taken out of context and used as a scientific tool, then I don't really care.
You, on the other hand, have yet to actually even pretend to approach science and the theory of evolution in good faith. This thread is a great indicator.
Au contraire, how many times have I stated that I think evolution takes place, just not to the extent you do???
OK, and?Genesis to Revelation is a consistent story of how sin entered the world, how it played-out through various stories, and how God provided us a way to be saved from the consequences of sin in hell through His Son who died and rose again. All we need do is repent and receive Him as our personal Savior. So, you see Jesus’ empty tomb and His resurrection is the climax of the story.
I think Genesis to Revelation is a lecture series by an American con man/preacher.Genesis to Revelation is a consistent story of how sin entered the world, how it played-out through various stories, and how God provided us a way to be saved from the consequences of sin in hell through His Son who died and rose again. All we need do is repent and receive Him as our personal Savior. So, you see Jesus’ empty tomb and His resurrection is the climax of the story.
I guess so, but your body of evidece has more holes in it than the Bismarck.
That's just a story of a God trying to appease Himself for something that He created that did not live up to His own high standards.Genesis to Revelation is a consistent story of how sin entered the world, how it played-out through various stories, and how God provided us a way to be saved from the consequences of sin in hell through His Son who died and rose again. All we need do is repent and receive Him as our personal Savior. So, you see Jesus’ empty tomb and His resurrection is the climax of the story.
It is very difficult to believe that you have not knowingly taken a fragment of @FrumiousBandersnatch 's post out of context and, through your comment, implied that he has confirmed your beliefs. It is either cynically dishonest of you, or astoundingly silly. Either way it is not a pretty picture. Or perhaps, given my advancing senility, I just misunderstood what you meant. I await, eagerly, a reply.That's good enough for me
You are incapable of demonstrating this. Your feeble attempts (rare as they are) to actually support your position ends up being nothing more than regurgitated PRATTs.I guess so, but your body of evidece has more holes in it than the Bismarck.
No... you got it right.It is very difficult to believe that you have not knowingly taken a fragment of @FrumiousBandersnatch 's post out of context and, through your comment, implied that he has confirmed your beliefs. It is either cynically dishonest of you, or astoundingly silly. Either way it is not a pretty picture. Or perhaps, given my advancing senility, I just misunderstood what you meant. I await, eagerly, a reply.
Every post of yours reads like a 5th grader mad that not everyone goes to your church.Actually, this is the only personal response of yours thus far that makes any sense whatsoever. Everything else just seems like a rant.
Couldn't care less what the bible says - look at how its biggest defenders and advocates ACT.While your statement is correct in and of itself, you seem ignorant to the fact that the bible recognizes and already acknowledges this human frailty.
Your respect of science stops when it fails to prop up your interpretation of ancient middle eastern tales.Something else I think you fail to recognize, I respect science more than you think, it’s just not at the top of my bookshelf.
Quite - that's a categorically and definitively unscientific assertion.Your respect of science stops when it fails to prop up your interpretation of ancient middle eastern tales.
And regardless, you are very disingenuous considering this statement of yours:
"If you're speaking of macro evolution there will never be any proof of it; it would contradict God's word, and that's not going to happen."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?