Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You can do all things with verses taken out of context (and do funky things with the text).
You were doing so well, imo, until the last paragraph.If Calvinism was correct, every single person on Earth would go to heaven. Here's the reasoning behind my claim:
The Bible says, "The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." - 2 Peter 3:9 KJV
Calvinism teaches that going to heaven is only based on God's will, not on our own will. So if God chooses who goes to heaven according to his will, and he is not willing that any should perish (as taught in 2 Peter 3:9), then the logical conclusion is that everyone goes to heaven. The will of God is that the whole world would be saved.
But everyone knows that according to the Bible everyone is not going to heaven. Therefore Calvinism must be false.
You were doing so well, imo, until the last paragraph.
Where does it say that everyone is not going to heaven?
Oh good, thanks for that, BobRyan.Matt 7 - the MANY on the road to hell and the FEW enter through the narrow gate that leads to life.
Rev 13 - at the end - the entire world is taken into deception.
Matt 24 - deception so powerful that if possible it would deceive the very elect.
2 Thess 2 - "all power signs and wonders" - deception that overpowers those who "perish because they did not receive a love of the truth so as to be saved". God himself "turns them over to strong delusion"
Do you mean the verses quoted without context or explanation?I am happy with that as the "answer" to the texts presented if you are. I think it is a good example of where the gap is.
Well, since you provided no context, and posted with a lot of color and underlining and such, consider it pointed out.True and if I ever do that -- I think someone will point to some details to show I have done it.
With all the calvinist hate on this forum, it would make me think there are more arminianists than calvinists in the world. It seems like every other day there is a new thread about why calvinism is false.
If Calvinism was correct, every single person on Earth would go to heaven. Here's the reasoning behind my claim:
The Bible says, "The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." - 2 Peter 3:9 KJV
Calvinism teaches that going to heaven is only based on God's will, not on our own will. So if God chooses who goes to heaven according to his will, and he is not willing that any should perish (as taught in 2 Peter 3:9), then the logical conclusion is that everyone goes to heaven. The will of God is that the whole world would be saved.
But everyone knows that according to the Bible everyone is not going to heaven. Therefore Calvinism must be false.
To Quote a great evangelist and preacher:
George Whitfield said, “We are all born Arminians.” It is grace that turns us into Calvinists.
?? What about him —why mention Wesley, what is your point?But what about Whitfield’s best friend and fellow Methodist, indeed the founder of Methodism, John Wesley, with whom he famously made a pact to “agree to disagree” on Calvinism?
"Whoever does not believe in the Son is condemned already." (John 3:18)You were doing so well, imo, until the last paragraph.
Where does it say that everyone is not going to heaven?
Now, don’t get me wrong, I believe that everyone is not going to heaven, sadly.
But I just don’t know off the top of my head where that is specifically stated in the Bible.
Seem to be. . .Other than that small question, I have to say I found your post quite well done.
Also, I’m not sure, but are there many people who believe in Calvinism any more?
I also love Rev. Billy Graham, memory eternal as the greatest evangelizer of the past century, who among other heroic virtues, received the blessing of the Moscow Patriarch to preach in the Soviet Union, which was extremely helpful to the Russian Orthodox Church, because the Communists prevented them from catechizing the youth and interfered with their preaching to the point where most Russian priests and bishops weren’t able to do any, other than the Paschal Homily of St. John Chrysostom, which is read annually, so Rev. Billy Graham made a huge difference in terms of keeping the Christian faith alive in the Orthodox Church and every other church in the USSR, because as an American celebrity, the Soviets didn’t dare lay a finger on him; the KGB could only look on at the harbinger of their demise, the Gospel of our Lord, being preached openly, in malign wrath. I do not count Graham with the three great televangelists however, as he was more of a general evangelist and open-air preacher in the historic revivalist tradition.
?? What about him —why mention Wesley, what is your point?
But what about Whitfield’s best friend and fellow Methodist, indeed the founder of Methodism, John Wesley, with whom he famously made a pact to “agree to disagree” on Calvinism?
Thanks ...I couldn't figure why you said that.If we take George Whitfield too literally, it would imply that John Wesley was without grace.
Conversely, if we interpret John Wesley too literally in his argument over Calvinism with Whitefield, when John Wesley said to George Whitefield, “your God is my devil”, we might mistakenly assume Wesley was accusing his friend of diabolatry (devil worship).
The two used a certain amount of hyperbole in their exchanges.
Thanks ...I couldn't figure why you said that.
There was obviously a bit of grace at work between them. After all, Calvinists debate Arminians every day here, and usually, one isn't calling the other a devil or declaring their suitability for the Lake of Fire.
Well, I like to think the difference from Sunni/Shia for the Calvinist/Arminian is Christ. We don't limit Christ (not even the Calvinist) from saving absolutely whomever he is pleased to save. I may not represent the Calvinists well in this, but I believe it possible, even likely, that there are more Arminian-leaning Elect than pure Calvinists. My reasoning has to do with the very Calvinistic fact that GOD is the one who selects and saves, and not by any virtue of the one being saved.Indeed, that’s more how Sunni-Shia debates tend to play out, until the shouting voices are replaced with the clash of scimitars.
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." - 2 Peter 3:9 KJVIf Calvinism was correct, every single person on Earth would go to heaven. Here's the reasoning behind my claim:
The Bible says, "The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." - 2 Peter 3:9 KJV
Calvinism teaches that going to heaven is only based on God's will, not on our own will. So if God chooses who goes to heaven according to his will, and he is not willing that any should perish (as taught in 2 Peter 3:9), then the logical conclusion is that everyone goes to heaven. The will of God is that the whole world would be saved.
But everyone knows that according to the Bible everyone is not going to heaven. Therefore Calvinism must be false.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?