Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
If big-bang happened, why aren`t everything scorched?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ophiolite" data-source="post: 74616826" data-attributes="member: 234799"><p>Calling them philosophical reasons was probably rather pompous. It's more a case that I just don't like the concept; it doesn't appeal to me. This viewpoint is indistinguishable from the rejection of the theory by [USER=410119]@Mantishand[/USER] , with one exception: I acknowledge that the rejection of the idea, because I don't like it, is foolish, pointless and irrelevant. Consequently I accept that Big Bang Theory is the best current explanation for our observations. </p><p></p><p>Why doesn't it appeal to me? I'm not sure. Why do I like avocado, but not cucumber? It's just the way things are. </p><p>I think the discarded Steady State Theory, favoured by Hoyle and others has more elegance and internal beauty, but why I think that is beyond my power to discern. </p><p></p><p>I am sorry you have chosen to leave. You lose the opportunity to add to your knowledge. </p><p>I'm sorry you feel insulted. I'll put it down to my lack of skill at communicating accurate, but unwelcome information in an acceptable manner.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ophiolite, post: 74616826, member: 234799"] Calling them philosophical reasons was probably rather pompous. It's more a case that I just don't like the concept; it doesn't appeal to me. This viewpoint is indistinguishable from the rejection of the theory by [USER=410119]@Mantishand[/USER] , with one exception: I acknowledge that the rejection of the idea, because I don't like it, is foolish, pointless and irrelevant. Consequently I accept that Big Bang Theory is the best current explanation for our observations. Why doesn't it appeal to me? I'm not sure. Why do I like avocado, but not cucumber? It's just the way things are. I think the discarded Steady State Theory, favoured by Hoyle and others has more elegance and internal beauty, but why I think that is beyond my power to discern. I am sorry you have chosen to leave. You lose the opportunity to add to your knowledge. I'm sorry you feel insulted. I'll put it down to my lack of skill at communicating accurate, but unwelcome information in an acceptable manner. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
If big-bang happened, why aren`t everything scorched?
Top
Bottom