• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

If a tree falls in a forest

Law of Loud

Apparently a Librul Moonbat <[wash my mouth][wa
Aug 31, 2004
2,103
133
38
Seattle
✟25,493.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
If a tree falls in a forest and nobody is around to hear it, does it make any sound?

This question is what I would consider to be one of the most antagonizing questions I've ever heard, because the arguments about it consist primarily of, "If nobody can hear it, then there is no sound" and "It creates the vibrations, therefore there is sound".

Instantly, we have a problem in that we haven't defined "sound". The former defines sound as the perception of the vibrations, while the latter defines sound as the vibrations themselves. Without a clear definition of the word "sound", there's bound to be problems.

From Merriam-Webster, sound is defined as "mechanical radiant energy that is transmitted by longitudinal pressure waves in a material medium (as air)". If we follow the Merriam-Webster definition, then indeed the falling tree would cause a sound.

Take that you filthy heathens.
 

Telephone

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2006
504
45
✟876.00
Faith
Atheist
If a tree falls in a forest it will cause pressure waves to move through the air.

If there is nobody around the pressure waves will dissipate without registering as a sound in the brain of anyone.

If somebody is around the waves will register as a sound in this persons brain.

It is simple really, just semantics. Just decide how you wish to define 'sound' - a pressure wave or an electrical current in the auditory cortex of a human brain.
 
Upvote 0
B

Born_to_Lose_Live_to_Win

Guest

What if there is nobody around to see it falling?
 
Upvote 0

Law of Loud

Apparently a Librul Moonbat <[wash my mouth][wa
Aug 31, 2004
2,103
133
38
Seattle
✟25,493.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Born_to_Lose_Live_to_Win said:
What if there is nobody around to see it falling?

My oh my... I was wondering if anybody'd catch on to that possibility.

Perhaps it didn't fall at all...
 
Upvote 0
B

Born_to_Lose_Live_to_Win

Guest
Law of Loud said:
My oh my... I was wondering if anybody'd catch on to that possibility.

Perhaps it didn't fall at all...

Perhaps. The following is my personal opinion.

The actual truth of whether the tree fell or not does not depend on the evidence of people perceiving it.

For me to beleive that the tree fell or not, I need to perceive it. From all the evidence available to me, I can take a stand as to whether the tree fell or not. But what actually happened is what actually happened and is not modified by what i think of it. the modification is in my perception only.
 
Upvote 0

Soul_Searcher

Contributor
Apr 25, 2002
5,789
263
Southwest US
Visit site
✟7,479.00
Faith
Other Religion
Hi LoL,

"This question is what I would consider to be one of the most antagonizing questions I've ever heard, because the arguments about it consist primarily of, "If nobody can hear it, then there is no sound" and "It creates the vibrations, therefore there is sound"."

Ah, but if there is no-one there to hear it, and it doesn't make a noise, does it even exist in the first place?
 
Upvote 0
B

Born_to_Lose_Live_to_Win

Guest
If I wasn't around when a tree fell, I would say that as far as I know, the tree didn't make a sound. I wouldn't categorically assert that the tree didn't make a sound. It holds for entire humanity too. As far as humanity's perceptions are concerned the tree didn't make a sound.

It is not an absolute categorical proclamation that the tree didn't make a sound.
 
Upvote 0

Telephone

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2006
504
45
✟876.00
Faith
Atheist


It really is not this complex, define sound, then answer the question, no mystery neeeded.
 
Upvote 0

Law of Loud

Apparently a Librul Moonbat <[wash my mouth][wa
Aug 31, 2004
2,103
133
38
Seattle
✟25,493.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Telephone said:
It really is not this complex, define sound, then answer the question, no mystery neeeded.

That's what I tried to do in the OP... but I get the impression that most people didn't really bother to read the OP.
 
Upvote 0

TeddyKGB

A dude playin' a dude disgused as another dude
Jul 18, 2005
6,495
455
48
Deep underground
✟9,013.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Born_to_Lose_Live_to_Win said:
Happy B'day!
Not so much. Thanks anyway.
What do you mean by your question?

Is sarcasm an acquired attitude of the people with the brain symbol?
Just a bad joke about Schrodinger's Cat.
 
Upvote 0
B

Born_to_Lose_Live_to_Win

Guest
Telephone said:
It really is not this complex, define sound, then answer the question, no mystery neeeded.

The question leads one to infer that the tree actually makes or does not make a sound when it falls.

The perception of sound is from the hearer. The falling tree does the same thing every time.

If I am there the waves are gonna hit my hear, if not the waves don't reach me.

All I can say is I didn't hear it, so I have no reason to believe it made a sound. Nothing more that.

'The tree didn't make a sound' is my perspective.
 
Upvote 0

DailyBlessings

O Christianos Cryptos; Amor Vincit Omnia!
Oct 21, 2004
17,775
983
39
Berkeley, CA
Visit site
✟37,754.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
See, you haven't really contemplated the question carefully enough- in the tradition from which that question proceeds, the empirical attributes of the descending tree are only the first step to the consideration of the question.
 
Upvote 0