Electric Sceptic said:No idea what this refers to.
TheEmily said:WHY somebody pushed their beliefs is totally irrelevant. The questions was IF these people push their beliefs. Non-Christians (or like the examples he cited, eg gays, atheists, "naked" women) tend not to, whereas christians do, and it seems you agree with me!
Mwwwaaahhh!!!
MC1171611 said:So, if I'm walking down the street, and see that your house is on fire without your knowledge, with you inside, I should ignore it and walk off, because I might offend you with my "belief"?
When I see someone that is ignorant of his/her impending eternal destructon in Hell, I am supposed to ignore them, and let them burn forever?
He does have a point, however. The control of the news media, Hollywood, and the advertising industry is in the hands of wicked, vile people, who don't care who their offal offends.
These people want money; we want your soul to escape eternal torment. So, there is a big difference.
Asimov said:Huh?
Asimov said:That's your belief...the house on fire has nothing to do with beliefs.
Asimov said:More commonly known as Christians?
Asimov said:Not really...considering what many of us have had to put up with from people like you.
Please cite ANY museum displaying any such thing.onemessiah said:Sorry, forgot to include your post. You were saying at the beginning of the thread that the average human height was 5'6" and around 140 lbs. I replied that human remains have been found that belonged to giant people, their sizes ranging from 9' to 14' tall. Your reply was that no such remains were found.
My response to that is that these remains are displayed in museums.
I don't doubt that some of the pictures of "findings" are hoaxes; but the fact still remains that we have credible physical evidence for the existence of giant human beings.
Bad analogy. To be accurate, the house isn't on fire - it's some 'special' type of danger that only you can see - to the best of my knowledge, it's not in danger at all. And I'm well aware that you and others like you think it's in danger. So yes, you should ignore it, because I already know that you think it's in danger.MC1171611 said:So, if I'm walking down the street, and see that your house is on fire without your knowledge, with you inside, I should ignore it and walk off, because I might offend you with my "belief"?
If you can find anyone over the age of ten in the United States who's not aware that he'll burn in hell (according to Xianity) unless he believes, go right ahead. Until then, leave everyone else alone.MC1171611 said:When I see someone that is ignorant of his/her impending eternal destructon in Hell, I am supposed to ignore them, and let them burn forever?
Electric Sceptic said:Please cite ANY museum displaying any such thing.
Close. They're run by scientists.MC1171611 said:You're right. There are probably not any of these in museums. That is because they are run by EVOLUTIONISTS!
No, there haven't. This is simply rampant paranoia.MC1171611 said:Many people that have made discoveries that mess up the "theory" have been fired, or kicked out of the "scientific" community.
MC1171611 said:If your house is on fire, with you in it, and I don't warn you, then your blood will be on my hands. It's that simple.
That is a fact, wether you want to believe it or not. Truth needs no apologetics.
Those people are not Christians. Christian means Christ-like, and that is the absolute lase modifier that could be applied to people like that.
If you are so hard-headed, then you can go to Hell, if that is what you want. You don't have to believe the Truth that has been given to you. God has given you a chance, and you are rejecting it. Your blood is now on your own hands: don't blame me.
MC1171611 said:in the hands of wicked, vile people
If you are so hard-headed, then you can go to Hell, if that is what you want. You don't have to believe the Truth that has been given to you. God has given you a chance, and you are rejecting it. Your blood is now on your own hands: don't blame me.
MC1171611 said:You're right. There are probably not any of these in museums. That is because they are run by EVOLUTIONISTS! Many people that have made discoveries that mess up the "theory" have been fired, or kicked out of the "scientific" community.
then he comes back and says...onemessiah said:SI replied that human remains have been found that belonged to giant people, their sizes ranging from 9' to 14' tall. Your reply was that no such remains were found.
My response to that is that these remains are displayed in museums.
I don't doubt that some of the pictures of "findings" are hoaxes; but the fact still remains that we have credible physical evidence for the existence of giant human beings.
MC1171611 said:You're right. There are probably not any of these <evidences of giant humans> in museums. That is because they are run by EVOLUTIONISTS! Many people that have made discoveries that mess up the "theory" have been fired, or kicked out of the "scientific" community.
corvus_corax said:So which is it MC1171611? Are they in museums (as you solidly stated to begin with), or are they NOT in museums?
Just a note - MC1171611 didn't claim they are on display in museums. It was onemessiah who claimed that. MC1171611 jumped up to say that there aren't any, because of some huge world-wide conspiracy. So he hasn't been inconsistent.corvus_corax said:then he comes back and says...
So which is it MC1171611? Are they in museums (as you solidly stated to begin with), or are they NOT in museums?
Which is it? On display or not?
Please make up your mind. The very least you could do is be consistent in your assertions.
Yes, and you haven't backed that up in any way. Which is, of course, no surprise to any of us.MC1171611 said:You really ought to check on who you are quoting, buddy. I never said that there is anything in museums: I said that the reason that there are no specimens of giant men in museums is because they are run by believers in the evolution "theory."
Quite right, my badElectric Sceptic said:Just a note - MC1171611 didn't claim they are on display in museums. It was onemessiah who claimed that. MC1171611 jumped up to say that there aren't any, because of some huge world-wide conspiracy. So he hasn't been inconsistent.
Quite right, my badMC1171611 said:You really ought to check on who you are quoting, buddy. I never said that there is anything in museums: I said that the reason that there are no specimens of giant men in museums is because they are run by believers in the evolution "theory."
Electric Sceptic said:Please cite ANY museum displaying any such thing.
It's nosense. We don't have any credible physical evidence for the existence of giant human beings (aside, of course, from 'normal' exceptionally tall people, such as Robert Wadlow who, according to Guinness, is the tallest human ever, at 8' 11").
Mt Blanco (HERE) has removed the picture of the giant femuronemessiah said:One such museum is Mt. Blanco Fossil Museum in Crosbyton, Texas. I will get a link for you. They post a picture of a 47" human femur bone belonging to a human they estimate to be between 12'-14' tall and 1200 lbs.
Sorry, but you'll have to do better than that. I can't find any mention of the bone in question on their website, but I may well have missed it.onemessiah said:One such museum is Mt. Blanco Fossil Museum in Crosbyton, Texas. I will get a link for you. They post a picture of a 47" human femur bone belonging to a human they estimate to be between 12'-14' tall and 1200 lbs.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?