1) Why would a god let a child get murded or why would he not prevent a rape, or why would he not prevent an earthquake before it happens.
Hi godhereornot. I think that because humanity is currently separated from God we must suffer, but there doesn't seem to be much rhyme or reason in who ends up suffering the most, and who leads a rather lucky life. The Bible seems to embrace a bit of a paradox. Here are two helpful quotes on this:
Ecclesiastes 9:1-2: "This, too, I carefully explored: Even though the actions of godly and wise people are in God's hands, no one knows whether God will show them favor. The same destiny ultimately awaits everyone, whether righteous or wicked, good or bad, ceremonially clean or unclean, religious or irreligious. Good people receive the same treatment as sinners, and people who make promises to God are treated like people who don't."
So the Bible says we all have to suffer, and some people are unlucky and some people are lucky in how much they suffer, and this isn't based on whether you're a good, righteous person or not.
Psalm 68:19: "Praise the Lord; praise God our savior! For each day he carries us in his arms."
It also says above that even though righteous people are undergoing suffering, which it sounds like God could prevent, God is actually carrying them through the suffering.
I think pain probably has to be in the world because we're separated from God, and God carries us through the pain, which can take many forms (and some people are more or less lucky).
3) Why does god not be proved himself like come on TV?
The way I think about this is that I'm reminded of a story I once heard by a preacher. There were two men thinking of committing adultery on their wives, because they were bored with their marriages and other women were interested in them. They both went to the pastor to ask the pastor what they should do. The pastor went through the Bible with each of them and made it clear that they should not commit adultery. One of them struggled with it a lot but finally came around to the Bible's point-of-view and said they would work on keeping their marriage together. The other one decided they didn't really agree with the Bible, and after a while he ended up dropping out of the church altogether and his marriage.
The pastor said that the difference between the two men was that at the end of the day, the first one really cared about what the Bible said and there was something to 'grab onto' from the pastor's perspective. The other guy seemed to care but there was nothing really coming from his 'heart' when it mattered.
I think in the same way, for someone to become a Christian they can't passively or reluctantly accept it like someone might reluctantly accept a phone call. There has to be something in someone where they really want to 'come back' to God like the Prodigal Son - something for God to 'grab onto' like the pastor and the first man. Most people who aren't Christian really wouldn't be that 'into' the idea of being a Christian and worshipping God forever. The Bible says that if there is something for God to 'grab onto' a desire to seek God, then God will give that person faith.
4) If believing in god improves ones life why are there atheists out there who are rich and successful?
If believing in God was a surefire ticket to success then people wouldn't want to have a relationship with God because they loved Him, they would want to have a relationship with God because God will make them rich. It could be like trying to be friends with a billionaire since they can take you in their private jet to tropical islands. I'm not saying God should make it harder, but God can't automatically reward people for following Him and not make it a 'quid pro quo' arrangement rather than a relationship.
5) Who made humans, such complex only can be god however who made god he’s even more complex.
But every idea of complexity that we have has something in common: every complex object we can think of is a
finite object. But God is infinite. We don't really have
any experience with complexity in 'infinite reality'. We don't know whether 'complexity' even exists in the actually infinity, which is very hard to even define. So our notions of complexity may strictly apply to the finite, and not apply to God.
Perhaps the infinite is simple, but happens to also have certain characteristics in its simplicity - such as being a mind and a person. It's hard to process this idea but I think when it comes to the infinite we can't really apply our finite ideas of complexity.