Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nothing in response to the testimony of Scripture, other than a red herring?
You can take up your complaint with Paul, who clearly explained in a number of passages how God delivered us from the ten commandments and called it abolished.
Man, K4C is hammering your theology, or lack of theology I should say. Since the Ten Commandments have been abolished Victor then I'd imagine you'd have no problem with someone if they broke into your home and stole you TV, or your wife. You good with that?Nothing in response to the testimony of Scripture, other than a red herring?
You can take up your complaint with Paul, who clearly explained in a number of passages how God delivered us from the ten commandments and called it abolished.
This is false, and does not reflect your admission that God's "My law" is not according to Sinai.
Which Jeremiah 31:32 and Hebrews 8:9 testify isn't according to Sinai. God referred to His law with a possessive pronoun, and it isn't a reference to the ten commandments.Nope. He wrote His laws on our hearts so we wouldn't be compelled to sacrifice sheep.
Adventism doesn't recognize Christ's propitiation: He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant (Hebrews 9:15). Your concession to the Adventist rendition of an unfulfilled law is a denial of Christ's whole reason for the cross (Galatians 4:4-5).Obvious proof then that the Ten Commandments still stand in that Christ died because of them! If the law could have been so easily removed then Christ need not have died.
See Paul's conclusion that your condemnation is justified in Romans 3:7-8.Man, K4C is hammering your theology, or lack of theology I should say. Since the Ten Commandments have been abolished Victor then I'd imagine you'd have no problem with someone if they broke into your home and stole you TV, or your wife. You good with that?
Yes, I agree He wrote a Magnified law on our hearts.Which Jeremiah 31:32 and Hebrews 8:9 testify isn't according to Sinai. God referred to His law with a possessive pronoun, and it isn't a reference to the ten commandments.
On the contrary it reverences and respects His atoning work on the cross. The one who knew no sin dying for sinners....er, lawbreakers!Adventism doesn't recognize Christ's propitiation: He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant (Hebrews 9:15). Your concession to the Adventist rendition of an unfulfilled law is a denial of Christ's whole reason for the cross (Galatians 4:4-5).
How about just answering the questions Victor?See Paul's conclusion that your condemnation is justified in Romans 3:7-8.
Which Jeremiah 31:32 and Hebrews 8:9 testify isn't according to Sinai. God referred to His law with a possessive pronoun, and it isn't a reference to the ten commandments.
Adventism doesn't recognize Christ's propitiation: He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant (Hebrews 9:15). Your concession to the Adventist rendition of an unfulfilled law is a denial of Christ's whole reason for the cross (Galatians 4:4-5).
You mean God didn't want us to love Him with all our heart, mind, soul and strength and our neighbors as our self before Sinai?So what does it refer to, if not Sinai?
I know he sees what you write K4C. Just doesn't comprehend it. Good post!Did Jesus die for the sins of the world or for the commandments of God?
You must believe the government is wrong for putting people in jail for murder.
That was my answer. Paul experienced the same argument you're using, and concluded those using it worthy of condemnation. I don't need to add anything to his conclusion.How about just answering the questions Victor?
Aren't you going to make the smallest effort?You mean God didn't want us to love Him with all our heart, mind, soul and strength and our neighbors as our self before Sinai?VictorC said:So what does it refer to, if not Sinai?
Really? You want to stick with that?
Did Adam love God with all his heart, mind, soul and strength or love Eve as he loved himself?
God saw those that would stand on God's word of truth as worthy of condemnation? Really? Then why did Paul reference the Ten Commandments like he did?That was my answer. Paul experienced the same argument you're using, and concluded those using it worthy of condemnation. I don't need to add anything to his conclusion.
Which Jeremiah 31:32 and Hebrews 8:9 testify isn't according to Sinai. God referred to His law with a possessive pronoun, and it isn't a reference to the ten commandments.
Adventism doesn't recognize Christ's propitiation: He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant (Hebrews 9:15). Your concession to the Adventist rendition of an unfulfilled law is a denial of Christ's whole reason for the cross (Galatians 4:4-5).
This doesn't address the post you quoted. Nor have you offered any response for my first post on this thread. When all you can do is resort to red herrings, it indicates that you don't have a point to make that is based on Scripture.Did Jesus die for the sins of the world or for the commandments of God?
You must believe the government is wrong for putting people in jail for murder.
Go and read Romans 3:7-8 for yourself, instead of writing something that exposes your illiteracy further.God saw those that would stand on God's word of truth as worthy of condemnation? Really? Then why did Paul reference the Ten Commandments like he did?
This is false, and does not reflect your admission that God's "My law" is not according to Sinai.
Tough questions, I know. Can't handle being backed into a corner Victor?Aren't you going to make the smallest effort?
Do you need help?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?