• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

I am Legend

AndOne

Deliver me oh Lord, from evil men
Apr 20, 2002
7,477
462
Florida
✟36,128.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Has anyone seen this movie?

For those that did - did you by chance notice any spiritual parellels from the plot-line with Christianity?

I doubt the producers intended that - yet I found myself leaving that movie with a profound sense of "yep - that is a good description of fallen mankind and their response to Christianity..."

Highly recommend this movie - if you go - go with the parellel in mind. It will make the movie ten times more profound than intended.
 

SobriaInebrietas

Active Member
Jun 7, 2006
113
7
40
Lodi, California
✟30,280.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Has anyone seen this movie?

For those that did - did you by chance notice any spiritual parellels from the plot-line with Christianity?

I doubt the producers intended that - yet I found myself leaving that movie with a profound sense of "yep - that is a good description of fallen mankind and their response to Christianity..."

Highly recommend this movie - if you go - go with the parellel in mind. It will make the movie ten times more profound than intended.

That's interesting (I do plan on seeing the movie, but may wait for it to come out to video).

Have you seen "Omega Man" (the previous version of this story with Charleton Heston), and do you think that it has the same parallels? I have heard that it is a better version, but can't really say since I haven't seen either yet...

Erin
 
Upvote 0

arunma

Flaming Calvinist
Apr 29, 2004
14,818
820
41
✟19,415.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Has anyone seen this movie?

For those that did - did you by chance notice any spiritual parellels from the plot-line with Christianity?

I doubt the producers intended that - yet I found myself leaving that movie with a profound sense of "yep - that is a good description of fallen mankind and their response to Christianity..."

Highly recommend this movie - if you go - go with the parellel in mind. It will make the movie ten times more profound than intended.

I thought it was rather interesting how the main character was basically a guy who lost his religious faith only to regain it a few minutes before <insert spoiler here>. Didn't quite notice the parallel to the Gospel message, though. Perhaps you could elaborate.
 
Upvote 0

GrinningDwarf

Just a humble servant
Mar 30, 2005
2,732
276
61
✟34,311.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
I havn't seen the new version, but I have seen both the other film versions (The Omega Man with Charlton Heston and The Last Man on Earth with Vincent Price) and have read the original novel that all of them are based upon.

In The Omega Man, the Christ-symbolism is so obvious that
when Neville dies impaled at the end, he lays in the blood-filled pool with his arms open wide in a crucifiction posture.
This wasn't made so obvious in the book, but I suppose the parallels are there. I mean, Neville lives in the light; the Family lives in the darkness. Neville's blood contains the cure for the disease and therefore is mankind's 'salvation'...you get the picture.

As a sci-fi fan, I'd say that as usual, the book is far superior to the movie versions...but again, I havn't seen the latest movie version.
 
Upvote 0

AndOne

Deliver me oh Lord, from evil men
Apr 20, 2002
7,477
462
Florida
✟36,128.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
I thought it was rather interesting how the main character was basically a guy who lost his religious faith only to regain it a few minutes before <insert spoiler here>. Didn't quite notice the parallel to the Gospel message, though. Perhaps you could elaborate.

From strictly a symbolic perspective - I often feel like the protagonist of the movie. Stuck in a world gone crazy - surrounded by the walking dead.

I felt like the "infected" people in the movie represented fallen humanity - and that the unaffected, like Professor Norville, represent Christianity - with the zombie creature thingies stopping at nothing to destroy Christianity. Even when the good doctor tries to communicate to the "fallen" that he has the ability to save them - they become even more enraged and try to kill him all the more. That is a good representation of how the fallen often treat the chosen.

The movie just drips symbology of a fallen world and Christians who are stuck in the middle of it.

GD - first time I've liked a film version better than the book. The plot line is ten times better imo.
 
Upvote 0
Sep 10, 2005
1,620
1,693
63
SE
✟31,768.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
From strictly a symbolic perspective - I often feel like the protagonist of the movie. Stuck in a world gone crazy - surrounded by the walking dead.

I felt like the "infected" people in the movie represented fallen humanity - and that the unaffected, like Professor Norville, represent Christianity - with the zombie creature thingies stopping at nothing to destroy Christianity. Even when the good doctor tries to communicate to the "fallen" that he has the ability to save them - they become even more enraged and try to kill him all the more. That is a good representation of how the fallen often treat the chosen.

The movie just drips symbology of a fallen world and Christians who are stuck in the middle of it.

GD - first time I've liked a film version better than the book. The plot line is ten times better imo.

My family went to see it the other day. Now I wish I had gone with them. I tend to stay away from movies because Hollyweird leaves me with an upset stomach. I have always liked Will Smith but he has made some recent comments about Scientology and Christianity that may make me change my mind.

CC&E
 
Upvote 0

edie19

Legend
Site Supporter
Sep 5, 2005
20,810
10,317
69
NW Ohio (almost Michigan)
Visit site
✟136,321.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Has anyone seen this movie?

For those that did - did you by chance notice any spiritual parellels from the plot-line with Christianity?

I doubt the producers intended that - yet I found myself leaving that movie with a profound sense of "yep - that is a good description of fallen mankind and their response to Christianity..."

Highly recommend this movie - if you go - go with the parellel in mind. It will make the movie ten times more profound than intended.

haven't seen it yet - intend to (but my movie intentions often fall by the wayside). I do remember seeing Omega Man 100 years or so ago - but the details escape me in my older age. . . . :sigh:

Glad to have the recommendation though Keneth - might make it easier for me to talk others into seeing it:thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

edie19

Legend
Site Supporter
Sep 5, 2005
20,810
10,317
69
NW Ohio (almost Michigan)
Visit site
✟136,321.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
My family went to see it the other day. Now I wish I had gone with them. I tend to stay away from movies because Hollyweird leaves me with an upset stomach. I have always liked Will Smith but he has made some recent comments about Scientology and Christianity that may make me change my mind.

CC&E

I just read that about Will Smith & Scientology too - makes me rather sad. Talk about being decieved - but that's another topic and I really shouldn't take this thread away from the OP.
 
Upvote 0

arunma

Flaming Calvinist
Apr 29, 2004
14,818
820
41
✟19,415.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I saw it and thought it quite good. Most of the movie took on anti-God overtones, though. But touched on some ambiguous greater power in the end. Felt bad for the dog, I do confess!

In all fairness though, I might differentiate between making an overt effort to blaspheme God, and simply "telling it how it is." It is natural, unregenerate man's base instinct to curse God when he faces affliction. And whether deliberately or not, the movie does an excellent job of portraying this reality. We can notice that Will Smith's character openly admits that the destruction of humanity was exclusively man's fault, but freely curses God only a few minutes later. I'm not so sure that the filmmakers sought to display anti-God overtones. After all, the woman's "prophecy" from God turns out to be right, and the protagonist regains his faith at the end of the film. At the end of the day, I'd personally prefer a realistic movie to one in which all the characters blindly repeat "I love God" a few hundred times. This is not the way that God's inspired word conveys stories to us, so I suppose that it isn't the way our films ought to be as well. Besides that, this realistic sort of portrayal gives us the opportunity to actually learn something, even when the movie might have been created by secularists. Granted, Hollywood has hundreds of problems that they really need to fix, but I personally wouldn't say that a realistic portrayal of man's response to God is one of them.

And if nothing else, we've got bigger fish to fry, like the "Golden Compass" movie which is overtly blasphemous.

From strictly a symbolic perspective - I often feel like the protagonist of the movie. Stuck in a world gone crazy - surrounded by the walking dead.

I felt like the "infected" people in the movie represented fallen humanity - and that the unaffected, like Professor Norville, represent Christianity - with the zombie creature thingies stopping at nothing to destroy Christianity. Even when the good doctor tries to communicate to the "fallen" that he has the ability to save them - they become even more enraged and try to kill him all the more. That is a good representation of how the fallen often treat the chosen.

The movie just drips symbology of a fallen world and Christians who are stuck in the middle of it.

GD - first time I've liked a film version better than the book. The plot line is ten times better imo.

You know, I do see your point. I didn't pick up on it initially, but I can see how someone would come to this conclusion.
 
Upvote 0

arunma

Flaming Calvinist
Apr 29, 2004
14,818
820
41
✟19,415.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Random thought: Do you think that if a Christian enjoys that movie he is in sin?

Interesting question. I certainly think that enjoying certain things is sinful. As it says,
Though they know God's decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them. (Romans 1:32)
For example, when we enjoy stories that glorify murder, fornication, etc., whether written or on film, I would say that we are in sin. I would go further to say that I would think a regenerate person would naturally detest any book or film which dishonors God. However, the question we need to ask in the case of movies like this is: are we enjoying the storyline or the falsehood purported by the movie?

If a person is generally entertained by the idea of blaspheming God, then I would say that this person is in sin. If a person is enjoying the story, however, then I'm not quite sure what to think. For example, when I saw the Da Vinci Code, I genuinely saw how the story might be seen as creative if not for the intrinsic dishonor done to our Lord. But because of that dishonor, I found myself unable to actually enjoy the film. So my (non)answer for the moment is that while I'm not ultimately sure, I can't personally see how a believing Christian would enjoy this movie. But whatever the case, I haven't seen the movie yet.

Even so, I think it would be a good idea for mature Christians to watch the film, if for no other reason than informing ourselves about the latest heresy to overtake the already atheistic Western culture.
 
Upvote 0

cubanito

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2005
2,680
222
Southeast Florida, US (Coral Gables near Miami)
✟4,071.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yes, I will get aroud to a relevant point sometime...

When I first became a Christian, my parents forbade me to got to Church, meet w Christian friends, read any Bible or book they even suspected was Christian.

That put me as a teenager in the difficult spot of obedience to my parents vs the young convert's hunger for all things Christian.

Besides stealing a Bible from a local Church (boy did that tie me up in logistic knots as a young Christian wo guidance), hiding it with a penlight in my boxspring and training myself to awaken at 3AM for some reading, I found that the Christian message was dripping out of everything. If you even half try, every other song, TV plot or whatever just oozes Christianity (well, not so much for Gangsta Rap, but this was in the 70's)

I have come to believe that Clement of Alexandria (Titus Flavius Clemens) (c.150-211/216), and not Tertullian was correct. As CS Lewis puts it, and I paraphrase, Truth is so firmly woven into the fabric of Cration, that it pokes out even in the most pagan of philosophies. Or in the words of "Uncle Screwtape" of the "Screwtape Letters", "It is unfair! The Enemy (God) has every advantage. Even the vices can be only corruptions of what is Good.

Put another way, I have come to believe that perhaps Paul might have been more correct in His Epistle to the Romans than even Paul suspected. That Truth, Beauty, and the afterglow of God's Hand are so constructed into nature that it takes a serious effort for the mind of man NOT to see the Gospel at every sight.

I think it is not a matter of some writing "weaving in" some Christian idea or another.

Rather the difficulty, perhaps the impossibility, of constructing a story, especially an attractive one, WITHOUT the Gospel.

I hate chastisement. I love comfort, ease and as some radio preacher once pointed out., I wish my life would always go from mountain top to higher mountain top. I don't like the valleys in my life, and all that fine stuff about God building my character dosen't attract me one bit. "Jump for Joy when men persecute you for My Name's sake?" Are you kidding me?!? No, thanks, give me ease, prosperity, and smooth sailing all the way. That is my honest desire.

But I have to admit, grudgingly, that a little persecution does wonders for the soul, even the soul of a recalcitrant idiot like me, who has so l;ittle desire for His Kingdom or any righteousness whatsoever.
Having His Word so forbidden me for a short span made me very sensitive to His Word written everywhere.

So, to end with something worthwhile, a little known irony that God wove into History:

HG Wells was a popular atheist and novelist. He wrote a short story just before WWI called, if memory serves, "The Day of the Comet" (the movies based on this were COMPLETELY unlike the book. In it, just as WWI breaks out, a comet's tail brushes the Earth, and everyone who inhales it suddenly becomes eminently reasonable, puts down his weapon, and proceeds to joing his Felloe Man in the construction of a great humanist Utopia where, of course, such superstitions as Christianity and religion in general (cause of all wars, have yee not heard?) are replaced by a great, if somewhat nebulously described, communist Brotherhood of Man.

Well, along comes the REAL WWI. And what, praytell, is the only thing that for one day stops the war? A German soldier with a Christmas tree. If you've never heard of it, you ought to read on the Cristmas day truce/armistice of WW1 It is a fascinating historical account of how for at least one day the common soldier, quite at the surprise of the commanders, just put down their weapons and had "Peace on Earth, and Goodwill to men".

I just find it so fascinating, that a war so clearly caused by the utopian dreams of post-Christian Europe, so eagerly fought by secularized nations, as were ALL the massacres of the 20th century, was stopped in it's tracts not by some "Comet of Logi", but by a single soldier with a Christmas tree.

It is as if God, having read HG Well's, decided to write His own short story, not on paper with ink, but on the muddy battlefields of History with the souls of men.

JR

 
Upvote 0

arunma

Flaming Calvinist
Apr 29, 2004
14,818
820
41
✟19,415.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Arumna bro, glad to once again be typing on CHRITIANFORUMS, may an especially GoOd year rise up to kiss yo, bro

JR

Hi JR! Glad to see you back on CF (and equally happy that it is once again Christian Forums). Wouldn't be the same without you brother.
 
Upvote 0
C

Ceridwen

Guest
I have come to believe that Clement of Alexandria (Titus Flavius Clemens) (c.150-211/216), and not Tertullian was correct. As CS Lewis puts it, and I paraphrase, Truth is so firmly woven into the fabric of Cration, that it pokes out even in the most pagan of philosophies.
Between Christian and non-CHristian thought, there can be no compromise, but only antithesis.
 
Upvote 0