Hypothetical for Scientists

AV1611VET said:

CHAPTER ONE​

You hold in your hand a rock known as, let's call it, Dalite.​

This Dalite emits one particle called a Dalon every year on January 1.​

Analysis shows that the Dalite you're holding has 10 particles of Dalon embedded in it.​

CHAPTER TWO​

Absolutely without fail, observation shows that every time Dalite is formed (keyword: formed), it always forms with 100,000 Dalons embedded --- irregardless of the size of the rock.​

CHAPTER THREE​

Chris T. Ian claims that, according to The Book, this universe has only been in existence for 100 years, and the following converstion ensues:​

YOU: Not so --- I have a Dalite rock with only 10 Dalons left. This is evidence that this rock is 999,990 years old.​

CHRIS: Not so --- when God created (keyword: created) Dalite, He must have created it with only 110 Dalons (embedded age); but when it forms, it forms with a process that embeds 100,000 Dalons into it.​

QUESTION​

Would you be willing to admit that your evidence is inconclusive?​

Click to expand...

AV1611VET said:

CHAPTER ONE​

You hold in your hand a rock known as, let's call it, Dalite.​

This Dalite emits one particle called a Dalon every year on January 1.​

Analysis shows that the Dalite you're holding has 10 particles of Dalon embedded in it.​

CHAPTER TWO​

Absolutely without fail, observation shows that every time Dalite is formed (keyword: formed), it always forms with 100,000 Dalons embedded --- irregardless of the size of the rock.​

CHAPTER THREE​

Chris T. Ian claims that, according to The Book, this universe has only been in existence for 100 years, and the following converstion ensues:​

YOU: Not so --- I have a Dalite rock with only 10 Dalons left. This is evidence that this rock is 999,990 years old.​

CHRIS: Not so --- when God created (keyword: created) Dalite, He must have created it with only 110 Dalons (embedded age); but when it forms, it forms with a process that embeds 100,000 Dalons into it.​

QUESTION​

Would you be willing to admit that your evidence is inconclusive?​

Click to expand...

AV1611VET said:

Feel free to answer the question --- unless you think it's too hard.

Click to expand...

AV1611VET said:

No --- the created Dalite doesn't just look like it only has 100 Dalons --- it actually does only have 100 Dalons.

Click to expand...

AV1611VET said:

You can --- but I'll shoot it down.

Click to expand...

AV1611VET said:

CHAPTER ONE​

You hold in your hand a rock known as, let's call it, Dalite.​

This Dalite emits one particle called a Dalon every year on January 1.​

Analysis shows that the Dalite you're holding has 10 particles of Dalon embedded in it.​

CHAPTER TWO​

Absolutely without fail, observation shows that every time Dalite is formed (keyword: formed), it always forms with 100,000 Dalons embedded --- irregardless of the size of the rock.​

CHAPTER THREE​

Chris T. Ian claims that, according to The Book, this universe has only been in existence for 100 years, and the following converstion ensues:​

YOU: Not so --- I have a Dalite rock with only 10 Dalons left. This is evidence that this rock is 999,990 years old.​

CHRIS: Not so --- when God created (keyword: created) Dalite, He must have created it with only 110 Dalons (embedded age); but when it forms, it forms with a process that embeds 100,000 Dalons into it.​

QUESTION​

Would you be willing to admit that your evidence is inconclusive?​

Click to expand...

AV1611VET said:

I know what you said; and you coupled it with a dig about Last Thursdayism.

There is nothing in my hypothetical about deceiving anyone.

It's an honest question.

Click to expand...

CACTUSJACKmankin said:

Such a proposition is meaningless because there's no way to evaluate such a claim and ANYTHING can be claimed using this logic. BTW created with age=decietful God.

Click to expand...

AV1611VET said:

Is that a vote for: inconclusive?

Click to expand...

funyun said:

Actually, I created the Dalite. Usually when I create it I put exactly 100,000 Dalons embedded inside it.

Prove me wrong.

Click to expand...

Jet Black said:

unless it's necessary for function. For example you'd have to create a human at least on the way to adulthood, as creating a baby and leaving it to fend for itself in the wild would generate one dead baby shortly afterwards, unless perhaps a friendly lioness or something came along and gave it some milk.

Click to expand...