Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Humans aren't apes... but biologically how?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tas8831" data-source="post: 72461678" data-attributes="member: 397968"><p>Please explain how muscle placement affects strength - not how it affects mechanical advantage, but strength, since you wrote that chimps are three times stronger</p><p></p><p></p><p>What are you implying?</p><p></p><p>Why is it that you people cannot bring yourselves to admit that you really don't know what evolutionists think or conclude?</p><p></p><p>NOBODY has EVER denied that there are differences between ANY 2 taxa. You frequently imply that we do. Why?</p><p></p><p>This is like how you claimed that a cladogram showed orangs giving rise to gorillas that gave rise to chimps that gave rise to humans, all while proclaiming that you know all about phylogenetics and evolution! Please just stop pretending.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Almost certainly.</p><p></p><p>What of it?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>My gosh - if there were no "biological discrepancies", they would BE us! Why do you have such a hard time with this?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tas8831, post: 72461678, member: 397968"] Please explain how muscle placement affects strength - not how it affects mechanical advantage, but strength, since you wrote that chimps are three times stronger What are you implying? Why is it that you people cannot bring yourselves to admit that you really don't know what evolutionists think or conclude? NOBODY has EVER denied that there are differences between ANY 2 taxa. You frequently imply that we do. Why? This is like how you claimed that a cladogram showed orangs giving rise to gorillas that gave rise to chimps that gave rise to humans, all while proclaiming that you know all about phylogenetics and evolution! Please just stop pretending. Almost certainly. What of it? My gosh - if there were no "biological discrepancies", they would BE us! Why do you have such a hard time with this? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Humans aren't apes... but biologically how?
Top
Bottom