Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Humans aren't apes... but biologically how?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pshun2404" data-source="post: 72461634" data-attributes="member: 301030"><p>Sialic acids are one type of sugar molecule found on the cell surface of all primates, however apes are very distinct from humans in that they lack one oxygen atom. Insignificant? You think? Tell that to your cells. The Sialic acid molecules play an essential role in cell-to-cell communication and serve as binding sites for receptors on other cells. So even on this biochemical level we are distinct. There are also apparently stark noticeable differences in thyroid metabolism between humans (in all their varieties) and the great Apes (in all their varieties). So biologically, humans are not part of the great apes! We are two different groups, and will never be, and were never, and thus are not, the same.</p><p></p><p>Could have been the same in a common ancestor? Fine show me. One could have resulted from mutation? Fine did the ape mutate from the human or the human from the ape? Show me.</p><p></p><p>What would cause either entire group (each with their unique varieties) to lose an oxygen atom in this significant molecule, or gain one? In my opinion, the genetic plan in each unique creature’s DNA is already distinct at conception.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pshun2404, post: 72461634, member: 301030"] Sialic acids are one type of sugar molecule found on the cell surface of all primates, however apes are very distinct from humans in that they lack one oxygen atom. Insignificant? You think? Tell that to your cells. The Sialic acid molecules play an essential role in cell-to-cell communication and serve as binding sites for receptors on other cells. So even on this biochemical level we are distinct. There are also apparently stark noticeable differences in thyroid metabolism between humans (in all their varieties) and the great Apes (in all their varieties). So biologically, humans are not part of the great apes! We are two different groups, and will never be, and were never, and thus are not, the same. Could have been the same in a common ancestor? Fine show me. One could have resulted from mutation? Fine did the ape mutate from the human or the human from the ape? Show me. What would cause either entire group (each with their unique varieties) to lose an oxygen atom in this significant molecule, or gain one? In my opinion, the genetic plan in each unique creature’s DNA is already distinct at conception. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Humans aren't apes... but biologically how?
Top
Bottom