Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Humans aren't apes... but biologically how?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DogmaHunter" data-source="post: 72459732" data-attributes="member: 346237"><p>This is just plain wrong. And in fact, accusatory. You are literally accusing all biologists/geneticists involved in such studies to be forging the data.</p><p></p><p>The trees are output of mapping data. The algorithm just compares data and builds a data set of matches. The trees are visualisations of said datasets. The trees are what they are, not because they were "programmed", but because that happens to be how the data is organised. The algoritm doesn't organize the data. It just reflects how the actual data is organized.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'll take the actual words of genetic experts who do this for a living, from a random armchair "scientist" with a religious agenda on a religious forum, any day of the week.</p><p></p><p>You are borderlining accusing geneticsists of massive conspiracy and deception.</p><p>You have no idea how silly this makes you look, it seems.</p><p></p><p>You think you know better? Write a paper and publish it. You'll get a nobel prize in return.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DogmaHunter, post: 72459732, member: 346237"] This is just plain wrong. And in fact, accusatory. You are literally accusing all biologists/geneticists involved in such studies to be forging the data. The trees are output of mapping data. The algorithm just compares data and builds a data set of matches. The trees are visualisations of said datasets. The trees are what they are, not because they were "programmed", but because that happens to be how the data is organised. The algoritm doesn't organize the data. It just reflects how the actual data is organized. I'll take the actual words of genetic experts who do this for a living, from a random armchair "scientist" with a religious agenda on a religious forum, any day of the week. You are borderlining accusing geneticsists of massive conspiracy and deception. You have no idea how silly this makes you look, it seems. You think you know better? Write a paper and publish it. You'll get a nobel prize in return. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Humans aren't apes... but biologically how?
Top
Bottom