Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Humans aren't apes... but biologically how?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="xianghua" data-source="post: 72439676" data-attributes="member: 395317"><p>not realy. actually even evolutionists reject that paper:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982207013383#bib2" target="_blank">Evolution: Reducible Complexity — The Case for Bacterial Flagella - ScienceDirect</a></p><p></p><p>"This “single ancestor for all core flagellar proteins” hypothesis is, however, heavily criticized on the Panda's Thumb weblog (<a href="http://www.pandasthumb.org/" target="_blank">The Panda’s Thumb</a>) by Matzke, who suggests that faulty setting of BLAST defaults has misled Liu and Ochman <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982207013383#bib2" target="_blank">[2]</a>, and that homologies beyond those among axial proteins already noted are misinterpreted. Equally problematic, we think, is their conclusion that “proteins forming the flagellum, the rod, hook and filament proteins, originated in an order that mirrors the ‘inside-out’ flagellar assembly process”. Common sense might suggest such a scenario, but only rooted trees, which Liu and Ochman <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982207013383#bib2" target="_blank">[2]</a> do not provide, can prove it."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="xianghua, post: 72439676, member: 395317"] not realy. actually even evolutionists reject that paper: [URL='https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982207013383#bib2']Evolution: Reducible Complexity — The Case for Bacterial Flagella - ScienceDirect[/URL] "This “single ancestor for all core flagellar proteins” hypothesis is, however, heavily criticized on the Panda's Thumb weblog ([URL='http://www.pandasthumb.org/']The Panda’s Thumb[/URL]) by Matzke, who suggests that faulty setting of BLAST defaults has misled Liu and Ochman [URL='https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982207013383#bib2'][2][/URL], and that homologies beyond those among axial proteins already noted are misinterpreted. Equally problematic, we think, is their conclusion that “proteins forming the flagellum, the rod, hook and filament proteins, originated in an order that mirrors the ‘inside-out’ flagellar assembly process”. Common sense might suggest such a scenario, but only rooted trees, which Liu and Ochman [URL='https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982207013383#bib2'][2][/URL] do not provide, can prove it." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Humans aren't apes... but biologically how?
Top
Bottom