Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Human Evolution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SelfSim" data-source="post: 76850277" data-attributes="member: 354922"><p>Accepted.</p><p>The <em>context</em> is the issue at hand. Its up to you to express it accurately in order to get your meaning across, regardless of what I think it is. Its not <em><u>my</u></em> meaning that's being communicated .. its <em><u>yours</u></em>.</p><p>Accepted on the basis of the evidence consistent with that, provided in the Villmoare etal paper and elsewhere.</p><p>The ToE, along with LUCA, are science's best tested theories explaining how biology developed on this planet.</p><p></p><p>Expressing what <em>I think</em> would be completely inconsistent with the point <em><u>I've</u></em> been making throughout this thread, which is: What <em><u>I</u></em> think, or <em><u>anybody else</u></em> thinks, is <em><u>completely irrelevant</u></em> to the conclusions science draws from objective data. They're not <em><u>stories, beliefs, or feelings</u></em>.. they're <em><u>inferences</u></em>. Your question is simply <em><u>the wrong question</u></em> to be asking when it comes to science's position (especially when its about Objective Reality).</p><p>I even just demonstrated where this principle leads, using the Villmoare etal paper .. and you (appropriately) conceded because of what it showed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SelfSim, post: 76850277, member: 354922"] Accepted. The [I]context[/I] is the issue at hand. Its up to you to express it accurately in order to get your meaning across, regardless of what I think it is. Its not [I][U]my[/U][/I] meaning that's being communicated .. its [I][U]yours[/U][/I]. Accepted on the basis of the evidence consistent with that, provided in the Villmoare etal paper and elsewhere. The ToE, along with LUCA, are science's best tested theories explaining how biology developed on this planet. Expressing what [I]I think[/I] would be completely inconsistent with the point [I][U]I've[/U][/I] been making throughout this thread, which is: What [I][U]I[/U][/I] think, or [I][U]anybody else[/U][/I] thinks, is [I][U]completely irrelevant[/U][/I] to the conclusions science draws from objective data. They're not [I][U]stories, beliefs, or feelings[/U][/I].. they're [I][U]inferences[/U][/I]. Your question is simply [I][U]the wrong question[/U][/I] to be asking when it comes to science's position (especially when its about Objective Reality). I even just demonstrated where this principle leads, using the Villmoare etal paper .. and you (appropriately) conceded because of what it showed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Human Evolution
Top
Bottom