Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Human Evolution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doubtingmerle" data-source="post: 76829848" data-attributes="member: 6687"><p>We're done? </p><p></p><p>But where is this openness to evidence you told us about? You told us that Creationists don't ignore evidence, and you begged me for examples of evidence of an old earth or evolution. I gave you an example, supernova SN 1987A. You first passed it off with a claim that the supernova had moved 160,000 lightyears through space in less than 45 years. Seeing that shot down, you switched to a claim of the light from that distant supernova coming through wormholes or miracles. Seeing that shot down, you switched to a claim that God spelled out the plan of salvation in the stars, as if that had anything to do with what we were discussing. And when you were asked why a God that had wanted to communicate with us chose cryptic messages in the stars rather than a website, we get no answer, you are done?</p><p></p><p>So, do you still want us to believe that Creationists don't ignore evidence?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doubtingmerle, post: 76829848, member: 6687"] We're done? But where is this openness to evidence you told us about? You told us that Creationists don't ignore evidence, and you begged me for examples of evidence of an old earth or evolution. I gave you an example, supernova SN 1987A. You first passed it off with a claim that the supernova had moved 160,000 lightyears through space in less than 45 years. Seeing that shot down, you switched to a claim of the light from that distant supernova coming through wormholes or miracles. Seeing that shot down, you switched to a claim that God spelled out the plan of salvation in the stars, as if that had anything to do with what we were discussing. And when you were asked why a God that had wanted to communicate with us chose cryptic messages in the stars rather than a website, we get no answer, you are done? So, do you still want us to believe that Creationists don't ignore evidence? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Human Evolution
Top
Bottom