Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Human ethnic groups...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tericl2" data-source="post: 176611" data-attributes="member: 573"><p>Cheating? Were you ever really looking for answers? Seems like you have your mind made up already, so why couch your opinion by beginning this thread with a question? As if you were actually seeking some type of answer?</p><p></p><p>As for the two gene deal...the article clearly stated that was for clarity of the example. I think if you will do just a tiny bit of research you will find that many scientific examples of processes start with a very similar statement. Especially when written to be understood by the general layperson. When you factor in an increase in genes it makes the model even more plausible.</p><p></p><p>I still don't see that you read what I posted even. Much less the whole article at CA. </p><p></p><p>Noah started at mid-brown with all genes. After Babel, people with different languages went there seperate ways. Now the variance of the gene pool was diminished.</p><p></p><p> Oh, forget it. I don't feel like posting all this again. The explanation is there in what I have already posted and the accompanying link. Every so-called conflict you have with it was answered in that article.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tericl2, post: 176611, member: 573"] Cheating? Were you ever really looking for answers? Seems like you have your mind made up already, so why couch your opinion by beginning this thread with a question? As if you were actually seeking some type of answer? As for the two gene deal...the article clearly stated that was for clarity of the example. I think if you will do just a tiny bit of research you will find that many scientific examples of processes start with a very similar statement. Especially when written to be understood by the general layperson. When you factor in an increase in genes it makes the model even more plausible. I still don't see that you read what I posted even. Much less the whole article at CA. Noah started at mid-brown with all genes. After Babel, people with different languages went there seperate ways. Now the variance of the gene pool was diminished. Oh, forget it. I don't feel like posting all this again. The explanation is there in what I have already posted and the accompanying link. Every so-called conflict you have with it was answered in that article. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Human ethnic groups...
Top
Bottom