Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Human and Ape Inquiry, II
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SLP" data-source="post: 74466915" data-attributes="member: 2880"><p>And as this ancestor would have lived millions of years ago, why do you think that?</p><p>As the ark-tale would have left lots of human corpses - along with the corpses of these earlier "kinds" - where are they? That was supposed to have happened only a few thousand years ago. Why the double standard?</p><p></p><p>Says you.</p><p>People that understand the science find it satisfactory - why should your opinion matter?</p><p></p><p>'Counting genes' looks like a strawman to those in the know.</p><p></p><p>Switching one karyotype to another - are you cool with all horses being of the same kind? If so, you'd best get explaining how it is that Equus caballus (2N=64) and Equus przewalskii</p><p>(2N=66).</p><p></p><p></p><p>Thanks for your baseless input.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SLP, post: 74466915, member: 2880"] And as this ancestor would have lived millions of years ago, why do you think that? As the ark-tale would have left lots of human corpses - along with the corpses of these earlier "kinds" - where are they? That was supposed to have happened only a few thousand years ago. Why the double standard? Says you. People that understand the science find it satisfactory - why should your opinion matter? 'Counting genes' looks like a strawman to those in the know. Switching one karyotype to another - are you cool with all horses being of the same kind? If so, you'd best get explaining how it is that Equus caballus (2N=64) and Equus przewalskii (2N=66). Thanks for your baseless input. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Human and Ape Inquiry, II
Top
Bottom