Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
How we found out evolution is true: John van Wyhe at TEDxNTU
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frank Robert" data-source="post: 76876860" data-attributes="member: 433135"><p>You get one point for phlebotomy. Why not more than one point. Phlebotom was not based on a consilience of multiple unrelated scientific fields.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_General_Biology/Book%3A_Introductory_Biology_(CK-12)/05%3A_Evolution/5.07%3A_Evolution_of_Eukaryotes" target="_blank">The endosymbiotic theory explains how eukaryotic cells evolved</a></p><p></p><p>Isn't it strange that those who are dismissing evolution as impossible never provide any scientific evidence to support their beliefs.</p><p></p><p>The scientific method is open to scientists and non-scientists alike. Discovery Institute, AIG and others raise millions of dollars supporting anti-Darwin activities. Can you point us to any science research they have published?</p><p>Thanks for the example of how science is self-correcting.<a href="https://www.science.org/content/article/study-reveals-culprit-behind-piltdown-man-one-science-s-most-famous-hoaxes" target="_blank"> Study reveals culprit behind Piltdown Man, one of science's most famous hoaxes</a></p><p>Perhaps you can come up with something better.</p><p></p><p>Just as an aside: ALL professions, even religious ones, have their share of bad actors.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frank Robert, post: 76876860, member: 433135"] You get one point for phlebotomy. Why not more than one point. Phlebotom was not based on a consilience of multiple unrelated scientific fields. [URL='https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_General_Biology/Book%3A_Introductory_Biology_(CK-12)/05%3A_Evolution/5.07%3A_Evolution_of_Eukaryotes']The endosymbiotic theory explains how eukaryotic cells evolved[/URL] Isn't it strange that those who are dismissing evolution as impossible never provide any scientific evidence to support their beliefs. The scientific method is open to scientists and non-scientists alike. Discovery Institute, AIG and others raise millions of dollars supporting anti-Darwin activities. Can you point us to any science research they have published? Thanks for the example of how science is self-correcting.[URL='https://www.science.org/content/article/study-reveals-culprit-behind-piltdown-man-one-science-s-most-famous-hoaxes'] Study reveals culprit behind Piltdown Man, one of science's most famous hoaxes[/URL] Perhaps you can come up with something better. Just as an aside: ALL professions, even religious ones, have their share of bad actors. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
How we found out evolution is true: John van Wyhe at TEDxNTU
Top
Bottom