• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How tolerant are you of other religions?

How tolerant are you?

  • I don't tolerant other religions well at all

  • I tolerate people of other beliefs, but know they are wrong

  • I see merits in other faiths besides my own

  • I tolerate people believing anything at all

  • I can easily tolerate faiths related or close to my own

  • I can easily tolerate faiths that are popular in my culture

  • I accept every faith as possibly true

  • I don't believe in any religion, and think they are all dumb

  • I believe in no religion, but see merits in some

  • I am undecided or different


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

vajradhara

Diamond Thunderbolt of Indestructable Wisdom
Jun 25, 2003
9,403
466
57
Dharmadhatu
✟34,720.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
TWells said:
Then why did you contribute with this?:



Sounds a lot like the major Buddhist persecution of Christians in Sri Lanka in the last few decades...


the U.S. government states this: http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2002/14027.htm

Some evangelical Christians, who constitute less than 1 percent of the population, have expressed concern that their efforts at proselytizing often are met with hostility and harassment by the local Buddhist clergy and others opposed to their work. They sometimes complain that the Government tacitly condones such harassment, but there is no evidence to support this claim. (emphasis mine) Some Christian organizations claim that they continue to face opposition at the local level in rural areas but state that legal action or the threat of legal action generally has resulted in their being allowed to continue their activities.

the report goes on to detail some alleged activity by Buddhists, Christians, Muslims and Hindus against all the other religions on the island.

in fact, the report goes so far as to state:

For the past 19 years, the Government, which is largely made up of Sinhalese (who predominantly are Buddhist), has fought the LTTE, a terrorist insurgent organization fighting for a separate state for the country’s Tamil (and predominantly Hindu) minority. After unilateral ceasefires were declared in December 2001, the Government and the LTTE signed a ceasefire accord in February 2002, which currently is in force.

Religion does not play a significant role in the conflict, which essentially is rooted in linguistic, ethnic, and political differences. Buddhists, Hindus, and Christians all have been affected by the conflict, which has claimed more than 60,000 lives. In the past, the military issued warnings through public radio before commencing major operations, instructing civilians to congregate at safe zones around churches and temples. In the conflict areas in the north, the Government occasionally has been accused of bombing and shelling Hindu temples and Christian churches. In November 1999, the LTTE recaptured the area where the Madhu shrine, a well-known Christian pilgrimage site, is located, and granted some limited access for a period thereafter. During the period covered by this report the LTTE generally allowed Catholics access to the Shrine. (report dated Oct 2002)

i do conceed that the evangelical movement literature claims that these things occurred and are still happening. at this time, though, there is not a third, independent, party confirming the allegations.
 
Upvote 0

SqueezetheShaman

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2003
4,629
125
49
✟5,461.00
Faith
Agnostic

Because science says it is that old, not a religion.
 
Upvote 0

SqueezetheShaman

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2003
4,629
125
49
✟5,461.00
Faith
Agnostic
oh my gosh. is it that hard to understand?
i have a feeling explaining it will still get a big fat duh from you which indicates you do not want to understand. you want to be martyred.




Edited by Lanakila to change comment that used Lord as an expression. This is offensive language to Christians and violates the commandment against using the Lord's name in vain.
 
Upvote 0

SqueezetheShaman

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2003
4,629
125
49
✟5,461.00
Faith
Agnostic

*cough* martyr *cough*
 
Upvote 0

kdet

God lives in us
Jul 12, 2003
7,541
256
63
TX
Visit site
✟31,807.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
SqueezetheShaman said:
oh lord. is it that hard to understand?
i have a feeling explaining it will still get a big fat duh from you which indicates you do not want to understand. you want to be martyred.
Is it possible for you to address someone without being insulting?
 
Upvote 0

kdet

God lives in us
Jul 12, 2003
7,541
256
63
TX
Visit site
✟31,807.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
SqueezetheShaman said:
martyr....One who makes a great show of suffering in order to arouse sympathy

i believe you were doing that. It isn't an insult, it is an observation.

You believe WHO was doing that? And how a person phrases an "observation" can certainly be seen as being insulting.
 
Upvote 0
SqueezetheShaman said:
oh lord. is it that hard to understand?
i have a feeling explaining it will still get a big fat duh from you which indicates you do not want to understand. you want to be martyred.

I am pretty sure that Squeeze would have a problem with me using offensive language about gays or muslims or some other minority. However, when Squeeze is on a Christian website, Squeeze decides to use the Lord's name in vain. This is the hypocricy shown by many whose prime moral code is tolerance.

I have a feeling that if I started making fun of Allah, or wiccans or any other religious being or idea, Squeeze would be one of the first to jump on my case for it. Double standard? Nah.
 
Upvote 0

Heathen Dawn

Gesta Dei per Francos
Aug 13, 2003
1,475
52
47
Israel
Visit site
✟1,922.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Single
I tolerate all faiths except Christianity and Islam. I have zero tolerance for their teaching that the majority of humankind will be sentenced to a chamber of eternal torture (hell).

And of course, I think only metaphysical naturalism (nature all there is) is true.
 
Upvote 0

kdet

God lives in us
Jul 12, 2003
7,541
256
63
TX
Visit site
✟31,807.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

I do believe you hit the nail on the head
 
Upvote 0

How many Christians or Muslims have you assaulted or killed? Oh, you just mean that you disagree with them. I thought for a second you actually meant that you wouldnt tolerate them. Silly me.
 
Upvote 0
Heathen Dawn said:
I tolerate all faiths except Christianity and Islam. I have zero tolerance for their teaching that the majority of humankind will be sentenced to a chamber of eternal torture (hell).

I tolerate all faiths except for those who believe that the holocaust actually took place. I have zero tolerance for their teaching that over 6 million Jews were sentenced to torture and death (death camps).
 
Upvote 0

Heathen Dawn

Gesta Dei per Francos
Aug 13, 2003
1,475
52
47
Israel
Visit site
✟1,922.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Single
Aaron11 said:
How many Christians or Muslims have you assaulted or killed? Oh, you just mean that you disagree with them. I thought for a second you actually meant that you wouldnt tolerate them. Silly me.

I have zero tolerance for the religions of Christianity and Islam, not for the people who are held captive by them. That's a difference. I fight against ideas, not people.

I tolerate all faiths except for those who believe that the holocaust actually took place. I have zero tolerance for their teaching that over 6 million Jews were sentenced to torture and death (death camps).

False analogy. The correct analogy is: I have zero tolerance for Hitler, therefore I have zero tolerance for a god who sentences the majority of mankind to eternal torture. The Christian or Islamic god is in the same role as, and worse than, Hitler.
 
Upvote 0
Heathen Dawn said:
False analogy. The correct analogy is: I have zero tolerance for Hitler, therefore I have zero tolerance for a god who sentences the majority of mankind to eternal torture. The Christian or Islamic god is in the same role as, and worse than, Hitler.

Well, I believe in Christ and I don't believe that He sentences people to hell. Instead, He rescues them from hell. You aren't talking about the same God that I believe in and I am a christian.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.