Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I already explained, that was a typing error. That sentence should read: "There are NO observations of babies without parents".Start with observations, for you say:
"In fact, there are observations of babies without parents."
As experience tells us that all parents had been babies once: no.So, you are clear now, there are no observations of babies without parents.
What about parents, do you have observations of parents without parents?
Well, it was you who started with "babies are evidence for God"... I am only following your footsteps.Please, don't jump to God yet, we want to go there step by step.
A "please" wouldn't hurt when you make unnecessary demands like that... my previous statement should be clear enough.You think and then write, and then you read what you have written, and see whether you have evidence of what you have written.
Okay, are there parents without parents giving them their births?
Please clarify in plain simple direct language, what you mean by this sentence from you:
"As experience tells us that all parents had been babies once: no."
Rewrite that sentence in simple sentences that are consistent and coherent among themselves.
I won't. It's already late here and, as much as I would like to, I cannot spend the whole night talking to you. See you in the morning.I will be back in 40 minutes.
So, as we have concurred, dear atheists, that we both you and I seek evidence.
I have presented babies as evidence of God.
Please present your first evidence of no God.
And we have concurred on the information of the concept of God, as in concept first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.
Parents are not God, but evidence of ultimately the existence of God, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.
So, you are clear now, there are no observations of babies without parents.
What about parents, do you have observations of parents without parents?
This is going to be about abiogenesis, isn't it?
Inference isn't dependent on direct observation.
It is dependent on repeatable observations and a falsifiable hypothesis, which you don't have.
It is dependent on repeatable observations and a falsifiable hypothesis, which you don't have.
We base our inference on the repetition of patterns which indicate that life comes only from previous life.
Falsifiable you say?
You falsified that for us by trying to force abiogenesis to happen in your labs and miserably failing this proving us right.
Okay, my previous respondent and I concur on we both seek evidence.
And I bring in babies as evidence of God, he tells me that he will have babies also for evidence of no God.
What do you atheists here say, babies not evidence of God?
As I said, you folks proved us right by miserably failing to produce life via chemical means in a lab. Ignorance? Ignorance is to ignore the pattern that justifies the inductive leap and insisting on believing in something never observed to happen in nature and unrepeatable in a lab. That is ignorance par excellence.That would be an argument from ignorance. Are you sure that you took those logic classes? You seem to be repeating the same logical fallacies over and over.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?