Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
How to frame Kavanaugh or any other innocent man
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ringo84" data-source="post: 73218906" data-attributes="member: 157762"><p>Once again: Julie Swetnick signed a sworn affadavit and said that there were eyewitnesses that could corroborate her claims. A person with a security clearance would sign a statement on threat of perjury if she was making something up, but Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee seem to be refusing any sort of investigation in this matter.</p><p></p><p>So the claim that these reports are "uncorroborated" and "unsubstantiated" is false on its face. It's especially troubling because RedLeg occasionally says things that are reasonable and then lapses right back into the usual partisan talking points. I and many others have said it over and over and over again: the way to make supposedly ""unsubstantiated"" claims more clear is to investigate them.</p><p>Ringo</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ringo84, post: 73218906, member: 157762"] Once again: Julie Swetnick signed a sworn affadavit and said that there were eyewitnesses that could corroborate her claims. A person with a security clearance would sign a statement on threat of perjury if she was making something up, but Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee seem to be refusing any sort of investigation in this matter. So the claim that these reports are "uncorroborated" and "unsubstantiated" is false on its face. It's especially troubling because RedLeg occasionally says things that are reasonable and then lapses right back into the usual partisan talking points. I and many others have said it over and over and over again: the way to make supposedly ""unsubstantiated"" claims more clear is to investigate them. Ringo [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
How to frame Kavanaugh or any other innocent man
Top
Bottom