• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How Terribly Shameful And Unbelievable!!

YourFriendFromEngland

Active Member
May 26, 2002
73
0
ENGLAND
✟246.00
Faith
Non-Denom
I have just read through this article from TIME magazine (14/01/02), and am totally appalled to read how shamefully the 'Survivors of The Holocaust' have been treated, when they finally returned to their homeland - Israel.

Why wasn't much more care and respect shown to these people who have already suffered terrible atrocities at the hands of the Nazi's, whilst they were kept inside those EVIL concentration camps, during World war II

What does anyone else think about these revelations? Please read below!

January 14, 2002/Vol. 159 No. 2

Surviving The Past
After decades of neglecting Holocaust victims, Israel is finally working to ease the pain of wartime atrocities - BY MATT REES/Bat Yam

When his mother mistook him for an SS officer, Moti Mark knew something had to be done. Mark, then Israel's chief government psychiatrist, had taken time out from army reserve duty to visit his mother at Gea Hospital in 1996.

Since escaping from a wartime ghetto and making her way to Israel, Yochevet Mark had often been hospitalized for schizophrenia and depression — but the doctors could never do anything for her. This time, her condition was so bad that she thought her son, in his army fatigues, was one of the uniformed Nazis who had terrorized her. "It gives me goose bumps to think of the awful look on her face," Mark says. He and a few other young psychiatrists soon discovered a disproportionate number of Holocaust survivors in Israel's mental hospitals, where they had been neglected for decades. The doctors have been campaigning to have survivors treated for Holocaust trauma, instead of psychotic conditions that have resisted treatment for five decades.

Mark's campaign was a key element in a broader process that has changed Israel's handling of Holocaust survivors profoundly. The survivors' tale is one of neglect, penny-pinching and shame. Finally, Israel is being forced to accept responsibility for its 300,000 Holocaust victims — not just for their mental health but also their overall wellbeing. A parliamentary commission last April ordered Israeli banks to audit dormant accounts that may belong to Holocaust victims. Ministry of Justice officials tell Time they're hiring a group of former police investigators to locate heirs to abandoned properties whose European owners died in the camps. And Health Minister Nissim Dahan announced last week that he had visited a hostel for mentally ill survivors to "apologize that we did not treat you in the past as we should have."

At a time when Swiss banks and German industrial companies are making amends for their conduct during World War II, dozens of senior Israeli politicians, bureaucrats and mental health professionals acknowledge that the Jewish state must own up to its abuse of Holocaust survivors. A documentary that had its Israeli premiere at a film festival in Jerusalem last month is one of the first media examinations of Holocaust survivors' plight. The film, Last Journey Into Silence, directed by Shosh Shlam, has saddened and shocked audiences, but it is contributing to a growing debate about the problem. "It's the last chapter in the Holocaust," says Henry Szor, a psychiatrist who treats survivors at Abarbanel Mental Health Center in Bat Yam, Israel's biggest mental facility. "The conspiracy of silence is being broken."

yoram barak brushes past some purple bougainvillea and unlocks the heavy door to one of the psychogeriatric wards at Abarbanel. It's a hut built by the British army to handle mentally disturbed World War II soldiers. "If you'd been stuck in this place for 50 years, you wouldn't be doing very well, believe me," Barak says. Inside, old people in thin hospital smocks sprawl on the floor tiles to keep cool in the seaside humidity. Until they moved out last year, this was how the hospital's Holocaust survivors had lived for half a century. That move was the climax of the campaign by Barak, Szor and Mark to have survivors treated as victims of trauma rather than as hopeless schizophrenics who should simply be drugged.

When Barak came to Abarbanel four years ago, he found 67% of his patients were Holocaust survivors — compared to barely a third of Israel's over-60s generally. A similar imbalance was found in the country's other mental hospitals. Decades of using antipsychotic drugs like haloperidol and Thorazine hadn't worked. In the lobby of the survivors' ward, patients still shake uncontrollably and grind their jaws grotesquely from the side effects of such drugs. Barak changed the diagnosis of schizophrenia attached to most of the 120 survivors in his ward to "long-term post-traumatic psychosis." With Szor, he treated the patients using animal therapy, allowing people previously unable to communicate to build relationships with dogs and cats that reminded them of their childhood pets. Ultimately, they responded to people too. "Testimony therapy" also helped exorcise some of the ghosts as doctors listened for the first time to the inmates recounting the horrors of the camps. Within a year, Barak had been able to send 26 of his patients to a new hostel at Shaar Menashe, built to specialize in these kinds of socializing therapies. Last year, two more hostels opened, clearing almost 250 Holocaust survivors out of the mental hospitals.

Psychiatrists like Barak had to fight more than just a bad diagnosis made decades ago. They were up against a Zionist ideology that saw Holocaust victims as weaklings who had gone "like sheep to the slaughter" — unlike the strong "new Jew" Israel's founders hoped to create. Holocaust survivors were treated with contempt in their new country. Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion struck a reparations deal with West Germany in 1953 for DM 3 billion, then worth around $700 million. Israel agreed to give the money to survivors already in Israel; Germany would pay for those who arrived in the Jewish state after the deal was done. But Israel soon found there were more disabled survivors than anticipated, and the 1953 grant ran out. So until recently, the 40,000 survivors getting payments from Israel received much less than those who arrived later and were paid directly by Germany. In any case, most of the money Ben-Gurion got from the Germans didn't go to the survivors but to roads, agricultural projects and weapons for the new state.

That kept cash tight at the Finance Ministry office set up to handle claims. Until the 1980s, a survivor's first contact with the office was with a team of former police detectives whose mission was to root out cheats, not to process legitimate claims. When Rafi Pinto took over the department six years ago, his predecessor told him, "Your job is to save the state's money." Only in 1997 did Pinto publish details of survivors' entitlements that had been on the books since the 1950s. "There was a problem," he says. "People really didn't know what they were due." The number of survivors making claims quadrupled.

But the Finance Ministry did not change of its own accord. Likud Party lawmaker Avraham Hirshson and his aide Michael Handelsman went to Israel's Supreme Court to force the government to pay survivors the same amount as Germany. The court ordered a 24% hike in payments. "They've always treated survivors as nothing more than a nuisance," says Handelsman. Even now, getting money can be expensive. Pinto insists that people don't need a lawyer to make a claim, but many hire one to cut through the bureaucracy. The lawyers typically take a commission equal to six months of compensation payments. Since 1995, lawyers' fees have swallowed $25 million intended for survivors.

The government, too, takes commissions. When survivors or their descendants locate properties bought before the Holocaust in what was then Palestine, the government charges them a 5% "administration fee" for managing these abandoned assets through the years. Yet officials acknowledge they never looked for heirs to the property, which is now worth $35 million. Aharon Shindler heads the Ministry of Justice department newly charged with sifting through abandoned properties and bank accounts to find which owners may have died in the Holocaust. Shindler's list will be expected to be completed in the spring. A new squad of investigators being hired by the ministry will use it to track down heirs to the properties. "People say we gave them trouble when they made their claims," says Shindler, "and they're right."

Ministry officials say it looked bad for Israel to do so little to investigate Holocaust funds at a time when Swiss banks are under pressure from Jewish groups to unearth dormant accounts. A recent book by Bar-Ilan University professor Yossi Katz asserts that institutions like the Jewish National Fund, which was set up to purchase land for Jews in what was then Palestine, and Bank Leumi, one of Israel's biggest banks, failed to examine land records and abandoned accounts for Holocaust money. Last April, a Knesset committee finally pushed Israel's banks to audit these accounts.

If the Justice Ministry doesn't locate heirs, the Finance Ministry wants to take the property for the state and use it for the general budget. Advocates for survivors say it should be used to build more hostels like Shaar Menashe to replace private hospitals. The government was forced to close three private mental institutions after a commission of inquiry two years ago reported on appalling conditions there. Former nurses say patients were routinely beaten and strapped to their beds. Untrained, low-paid staff administered injections and doled out medications. When the hospitals closed, some of the patients were moved to Shaar Menashe. They had been kept heavily drugged and often in solitary confinement for decades. Many had lost the power of speech. "If they'd been treated right by Israel, about half of them could have lived normal lives," says Jeff Starrfield, Shaar Menashe's chief social worker. "Now it's too late."

A 67-year-old patient named Dov spent the war in Bergen-Belsen and came to Shaar Menashe after 40 years of treatment for depression in a private hospital, where he was given as many as 30 pills a day. "They used to take all my energy with their medicines," he says. "Why did they give me all those drugs?" Heath Minister Dahan said last week that he'd been to Shaar Menashe, apologizing to the survivors "in the name of the state of Israel and the Jewish people."

As survivors get older, it's not just the long-term mentally ill who suffer. At Abarbanel, 70 Holocaust survivors with no history of psychological disorder were brought in last year, mostly for depression. New research by Abarbanel psychiatrists finds that Holocaust survivors are 40% more likely to commit suicide than other old people. Though 1,200 survivors die in Israel each year, the Finance Ministry estimates it will still be making payments to the rest for another 30 years. The final chapter will be long, but perhaps easier than those that went before. At least some of the survivors with their minds still trapped in the camps may finally be liberated. With reporting from AHARON KLEIN/Shaar Menashe
 

ZiSunka

It means 'yellow dog'
Jan 16, 2002
17,006
284
✟46,267.00
Faith
Christian
Have you read any of Elie Weissel's books? They are great testimonies of what happened in the camps and the years after the camps.

I understand your rage about the treatment of mentally ill survivors. Really, it's a miracle that anyone came out of those camps with mental health at all.

At the end of the war, in the 1940's, there was not good mental health care anywhere, let alone a new, poor country like Israel. Israel had such meager resources to share with all its people, native and refugee alike, that they probably couldn't do much better at the time. Plus, psychiatry was not as advanced as it is today. There were no good medicines to fight most mental illnesses until the 1980's, forty years later. The drugs of the 40's, 50's, 60's and 70's often caused more harm than they did any good, not just for holocaust survivors, but for anyone.

It isn't that people just didn't care, it's that there was no way to help a lot of people. The horrors of the camps was too great, the resources to fight the mental illnesses were too small.

You have to remember that Israel's entire budget for all governement and all services came mostly from the donations of American Jews. People in the US made huge sacrifices in their own lives to send money to help establish Israel as a nation, to fund its government and to buy everything that was needed to start up a new nation from scratch. There just wasn't enough to do everything that needed to be done.
 
Upvote 0

strathyboy

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2002
761
2
Visit site
✟1,376.00
Having read some about the Holocaust and taken courses regarding it, I cannot say I am shocked by the article. I am saddened and disappointed of course, but in general the treatment of Holocaust survivors by all countries has been less than exemplary.
As Lambslove stated, early on Israel would not have been able to cope with the huge influx of Jews from various other countries, and in one sense, they should not be blamed for their inability or unwillingness to do all that could be done. For instance, say the US had been forced to allow the immigration of millions of Rwandans after that civil war a few years back. And then, the US was forced to look after these people, even though many would be sick, both mentally and physically. The US would be none too happy to have such a burden put on them, even though the US would be much better able to cope with it. The Jews who went to Palestine after WW2 were almost entirely ethnic Europeans, and just how "Jewish" they still were (in a purely physical sense) is open to debate. So in a way, Palestine/Israel was being asked to provide for the needs of many hundred thousand complete strangers from another country.
 
Upvote 0

ZiSunka

It means 'yellow dog'
Jan 16, 2002
17,006
284
✟46,267.00
Faith
Christian
I just know they did the best they could with what they had, which wasn't much.

Pointing fingers all the way back to 1948 will do no good. Learning lessons from what happened back then will.

The lesson? No nation is a political, economic or social island. Every one needs good relationships with other nations to help them make it through tough times. Maintaining positive relations is essential to us all.
 
Upvote 0

YourFriendFromEngland

Active Member
May 26, 2002
73
0
ENGLAND
✟246.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Lambslove, I didn't actually write this articlemyself! I think you may have misunderstood me, as you incorrectly accused me of 'Pointing fingers at the government'.

Please refrain from accusing me of Pointing fingers! I have always been on the side of Israel (especially in more recent times). I believe Israel definitely belongs to the Jews and I can't bear Mr Arafat. My very best friend is Jewish and we have known each other throughout from 3 yr olds playmates attending Moss Hall Nursery school and up until this present day too!
 
Upvote 0

ZiSunka

It means 'yellow dog'
Jan 16, 2002
17,006
284
✟46,267.00
Faith
Christian
Originally posted by YourFriendFromEngland
Lambslove, I didn't actually write this articlemyself! I think you may have misunderstood me, as you incorrectly accused me of 'Pointing fingers at the government'.

Please refrain from accusing me of Pointing fingers! I have always been on the side of Israel (especially in more recent times). I believe Israel definitely belongs to the Jews and I can't bear Mr Arafat. My very best friend is Jewish and we have known each other throughout from 3 yr olds playmates attending Moss Hall Nursery school and up until this present day too!

You took it personally, but I wasn't addressing this directly to you, just making an observation. Honest. :eek:

Nothing at all personal. Please forgive me for inadvertantly offending you. :cry: :bow:
 
Upvote 0

stillsmallvoice

The Narn rule!
May 8, 2002
2,053
181
62
Maaleh Adumim, Israel
Visit site
✟25,967.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
Hi all!

One of my (entirely self imposed) rules vis-avis my posting on Christian Forums and other interfaith boards (such as BeliefNet) is that I will not get involved in political discussions or flame wars period, no matter what nonsense (whether deliberately malicious or simply uninformed) is posted therein, usually by people who live far away from the region & have scant direct knowledge of events. I will break this rule only on very, very rare occasions. This is one of them.

Strathyboy posted:

The Jews who went to Palestine after WW2 were almost entirely ethnic Europeans...

The first clause of the first sentence is utter nonsense and simply not true. Israel's Jewish population doubled in its first 4.5 years of independence (May 1948 to December 1953); by the end of 1956, it had tripled. By 1967 it had risen another 43%. This increase was almost entirely due to the immigration of Jews, both from Europe and Islamic countries. As George Washington University Professor Howard M. Sachar writes in "A History of Israel": "No influx like it has been witnessed in modern times. It was an 'Open Door' policy from which older and vastly wealthier nations would have recoiled in dismay." Israel received these immigrants, the majority of them penniless refugees from DP camps in Europe and the ghettos and Jewish quarters of Islamic countries at a time when we were recovering from a catastrophic war of aggression waged our Arab neighbors had waged against us in 1948, when we were menaced by Arab terrorism on an almost daily basis, when we were faced with the unrelenting hostility of our Arab neighbors & in desperate economic straits.

Here are the numbers:

Morocco:

Between 1948 and 1953, about 67,000 Moroccan Jews left for Israel. (In June 1948, there were riots in Djerada and Ouda in which 43 Jews were murdered.) Between 1956 and 1960, a further 47,000 came. Between 1962 and 1968, another 100,000 (!) came.

Iraq:

Between 1948 and 1950, 13,000 Iraqi Jews came to Israel (at a time when such emigration was illegal). In March 1950, the Iraqi govt. legalized emigration but decreed that those emigrating had to forfeit all their property to the state. Bank accounts were also seized. From May 1950 until August 1951, 110,000 Iraqi Jews came to Israel. By 1968, another 4,000 came.

Tunisia:

56,000 Tunisian Jews have emigrated to Israel since 1956.

Yemen & Aden:

Between June 1949 and June 1950, almost 49,000 Yemenite Jews were airlifted to Israel.

There were 8,000 Jews in what was then the British Crown Colony of Aden in 1947. On Dec. 2, 1947, there was a savage pogrom in which 82 Jews were murdered and 76 wounded. 4 synagogues were burnt, and over 330 shops and homes were looted and burnt. By the time the British left in 1967, all of Aden's Jews had come to Israel.

Libya:

On Nov. 4-5. 1945, 148 Jews were murdered in a 2-day pogrom. By the end of 1948, 2,650 Libyan Jews came to Israel. A further 30,000 came by the end of 1951. A further 3,500 came by 1967.

Egypt:

25,000 Egyptian Jews came to Israel between 1948 and 1950. A further 4,000 came in later years.

Algeria:

5,000 Algerian Jews came to Israel by the time Algeria received its independence from France in 1962.

Syria:

By 1948, 15,000 Syrian Jews came to Israel. A further 4,500 came by the early 1960s.

Afghanistan:

459 Jews came from Afghanistan between 1944-1951. A further 4,000 came after 1951.

Iran:

39,000 Iranian Jews came to Israel by 1956.

Satisfied?

, and just how "Jewish" they still were (in a purely physical sense) is open to debate..

You are not an orthodox rabbi or an expert in Jewish demography. Thus, you are hardly defined to decide who is a Jew and who is not. The Judaism of the immigrants from Islamic countries mentioned above, as well as those who came from Europe, is not in doubt by those qualified to rule & decide on such matters.

Also, I'm very curious. How do you define a Jew "in a purely physical sense"? Under normative (i.e. orthodox) Jewish law, a Jew is defined as someone who was born of a Jewish mother or who underwent an orthodox conversion. Physical characteristics have nothing to do with it. (Although, in previous eras, we were believed by many to possess definitive characteristics such as hooked noses, horns, hooves, etc.)

So in a way, Palestine/Israel was being asked to provide for the needs of many hundred thousand complete strangers from another country.

UN General Assembly Resolution 181 from Nov. 27, 1947 (http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/go.asp?MFAH00ps0) proposed to partition Mandatory Palestine into two states, one Jewish and one Arab. The Jews accepted the proposal even though the proposed Jewish state was a truncated "bantustan". The Arab countries unanimously rejected the plan and instead, chose to launch a war of aggression (which, of course, they lost, thank God).

A Jew is not a stranger here; we're strangers everywhere else.

Be well!

ssv :wave:
 
Upvote 0

strathyboy

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2002
761
2
Visit site
✟1,376.00
Originally posted by stillsmallvoice

The first clause of the first sentence is utter nonsense and simply not true. Israel's Jewish population doubled in its first 4.5 years of independence (May 1948 to December 1953); by the end of 1956, it had tripled. By 1967 it had risen another 43%. This increase was almost entirely due to the immigration of Jews, both from Europe and Islamic countries. As George Washington University Professor Howard M. Sachar writes in "A History of Israel": "No influx like it has been witnessed in modern times. It was an 'Open Door' policy from which older and vastly wealthier nations would have recoiled in dismay." Israel received these immigrants, the majority of them penniless refugees from DP camps in Europe and the ghettos and Jewish quarters of Islamic countries at a time when we were recovering from a catastrophic war of aggression waged our Arab neighbors had waged against us in 1948, when we were menaced by Arab terrorism on an almost daily basis, when we were faced with the unrelenting hostility of our Arab neighbors & in desperate economic straits.

Thanks for the info, although my point remains. I was simply pointing out that the Jews that immigrated into Palestine were not native Palestinians, but were Jews whose families had been away from the area for centuries if not millenia.
I don't see why that introductory paragraph was needed.

Originally posted by stillsmallvoice
You are not an orthodox rabbi or an expert in Jewish demography. Thus, you are hardly defined to decide who is a Jew and who is not. The Judaism of the immigrants from Islamic countries mentioned above, as well as those who came from Europe, is not in doubt by those qualified to rule & decide on such matters.

Also, I'm very curious. How do you define a Jew "in a purely physical sense"? Under normative (i.e. orthodox) Jewish law, a Jew is defined as someone who was born of a Jewish mother or who underwent an orthodox conversion. Physical characteristics have nothing to do with it. (Although, in previous eras, we were believed by many to possess definitive characteristics such as hooked noses, horns, hooves, etc.)

By "Jewish in a purely physical sense", I meant in a secular way, as opposed to a religious way.
For instance, do you believe that there was no intermarriage between the Jews and the native peoples of the lands they were living in during the roughly 1900 years the Jews were absent from Palestine?
 
Upvote 0

stillsmallvoice

The Narn rule!
May 8, 2002
2,053
181
62
Maaleh Adumim, Israel
Visit site
✟25,967.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
Hi strathyboy!

Lessee...

I was simply pointing out that the Jews that immigrated into Palestine were not native Palestinians, but were Jews whose families had been away from the area for centuries if not millenia.

But we, the Jews, are the native "Palestinians". It is we, and not the descendants of - later or earlier - Muslim or Christian interlopers/conquerors, who are the natives of this land. Centuries and/or millenia make no difference. Our title to this land has not lapsed over time nor has it passed to others by conquest. (BTW, there have always been Jews living here; there has never been a time when this country was devoid of Jews.) Do you know the etymological origin of the word "Palestine"? After we launched (and lost :sigh: ) two major rebellions against the Romans (in 66-73 CE and 132-35 CE, respectively), the Romans decided to rename the country (which hitherto had been called "Judah", "Judea" etc.) in an effort to weaken the link between us & our country. They recalled our ancient foes, the Philistines, and renamed the country Palestina, after them, thus pulling the name out of thin air. But the Romans weren't aware (I guess) of the meaning of the word Plishtim, the Biblical Hebrew word for "Philistines." Plishtim is based on a three letter Hebrew root, p-l-sh, which means "invade" (The modern Hebrew word "to invade" (liplosh) is based on the same root. The modern Arab people known as the Palestinians, like the Philistines before them, are invaders (or the descendants of invaders), who are disputing this country with its true natives & masters, us. Since the failed revolts against the Romans, we made no secret (it's in our three-times-a-day liturgy and our blessing after meals) of our views that our title to this country had not lapsed, and will never lapse, despite the temporary loss of Jewish sovereignty and the influx of other peoples, and that we fully intended to return one day and reestablish our native sovereignty. If the Christian and Islamic worlds chose to ignore us, they did so at their peril. There were Jews living in this country long before either Jesus or Muhammad were born.

In I Maccabees 15:33-34, Simon the Hasmonean says the following to Antiochus VII's messengers:

"We have neither taken other men's land, nor have we that which pertains to others, but the inheritance of our fathers, which was in the possession of our enemies, wrongfully, for a certain time. But we, having the opportunity, hold fast to the inheritance of our fathers."

This about sums it up.

Our Sages ask why the Bible begans with the account of the Creation of the world. To make the point that the God who created the world can parcel out portions of it to whomsoever He pleases.

By "Jewish in a purely physical sense", I meant in a secular way, as opposed to a religious way. For instance, do you believe that there was no intermarriage between the Jews and the native peoples of the lands they were living in during the roughly 1900 years the Jews were absent from Palestine?

By the definition of "Who is a Jew?" is a religious question. The only normative, working definition of "Who is a Jew" is the religious one, i.e. a Jew is someone who was born of a Jewish mother or who had an orthodox conversion. We do, to use something of a loaded phrase, have the right to self-determination & this is how we Jews have defined ourselves since well before either Muhammad or Jesus were born.

Actually, there was surprisingly little intermarriage between the Jews and other peoples. We were outcasts, dhimmi. There were Jews who "married out" or assimilated out (and eventually married out as well), and there were converts to our faith, but very few of these. What Muslim wanted to (under Islamic law) sentence himself to death by converting to another faith? Until relatively modern times, Christians we\ho sought to convert to Judaism also did so at peril to their lives. Genetic tests on cohanim, descendants of the Aaronic priesthood (Jews surnamed Cohen, Cohn, Kahn, Kahan, Kahane or Katz, etc.) from widely dispersed Jewish communities (such as Yemen, India, Poland, Morocco, England. etc.) show a far greater genetic congruity with fellow cohanim from faraway lands than their non-Jewish neighbors.

...during the roughly 1900 years the Jews were absent from Palestine?

As I mentioned above, there was never a period when this country was devoid of Jews.

Be well!

ssv :wave:
 
Upvote 0