Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How do we know? Christ spoke in parables, but no one understood it, without the revelation of the spirit, that is.
You know yourself that pharisees heard Christ preach. They heard Stephen preach too. Paul held their coats while they stoned stephan, right after they heard his message. I dont think we have enough scripture to say whether paul did or did not hear the Gospel preached when he was a pharisee. My only point is that we dont know, but its likely that he may have heard it. Hearing the message however doesnt mean we understand it. Only Christ could have made Paul understand the message. Perhaps thats what he meant when he said that he didn't learn from flesh and blood.
I do appreciate your extrapolation, however we don't know if Paul was actually in Judea during the Ministry of Jesus Christ. Best we have is Acts where Paul sees the Risen Christ and is given his commands.
Yes we do have evidence Paul heard the Gospel by the preaching of Stephen.
As I said in a previous post what you present may be extrapolated but unconfirmed. We have Damascus Road and then the other visions or dreams Paul speaks of throughout the NT.
Unconditional Election is the "U" in Calvin's TULIP.Is the above from the Westminster Confession?
Unconditional Election is the "U" in Calvin's TULIP.
As such, it is a cornerstone of what we call the Calvinist view on "Predestination", in contrast with non-Calvinists like the Methodists and High Church Anglicans.
I understand that you may have an instinctual reaction against what are the substance of Calvin's main teachings. I read elsewhere by an ex-Calvinist that for a long time before becoming a Calvinist he had to be brought to Calvinism "kicking" away, because Calvinism's determinism went against his basic instincts about free will.
Moon of Isaiah,I think there are more than a few Christians that wonder at Paul being the foremost author of the NT.
As a pharisee he'd be well educated in the Hebrew scriptures. And since Jesus predates those in the spirit I think the way to ascertain if Saul was truly anointed by Christ to preach then we will know it by his writings at the Lord's behest.
If Saul in any way teaches contrary to Christ?
Test every spirit, remember.
Moon of Isaiah,
Nowadays the New Testament "critical scholars " commonly judge paul's writings to 35-55 AD, while they commonly judge other epistles and NT books to later dates. These "critical scholars" also propose that NT beliefs also developed or formed over the course of the 1st century. So in John 21 if you notice the writer makes a clarification on earlier Christian beliefs about whether Jesus was coming back in John's lifetime.
As a result, I have had "critical" thinkers claim to me that the apostles didn't even teach the resurrection appearances originally and that it was put in the gospels in 60-110 AD To make this argument they are forced to claim that Paul's narration of them to the Corinthians was a later interpolation not made by Paul. Why? Because Paul's letters are from 35-55 AD, showing that this really was a teaching already in apostolic times!
This shows how essential Paul's writings are to understanding the early stages of Christianity, even if you were to take a pharisaic viewpoint and to disagree with Paul about the importance of faith over Law and circumcision.
Logic is not the way to understand spiritual things! There cannot be more than 12 apostles! Peter calls him only beloved brother.
The word scripture in the NT refers to only the OT verses.
Not accurate:
Matthew 28:
18 And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. 19 Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Amen.
Luke 24:
44 Then He said to them, “These are the words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, that all things must be fulfilled which were written in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms concerning Me.” 45 And He opened their understanding, that they might comprehend the Scriptures.
46 Then He said to them, “Thus it is written, and thus it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day, 47 and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in His name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. 48 And you are witnesses of these things. 49 Behold, I send the Promise of My Father upon you; but tarry in the city of Jerusalem until you are endued with power from on high.”
I wrote:The pharisaic part of your remarks would be an issue too wouldn't it? Didn't Jesus call them a den of snakes?
If Jesus was instructing Saul post ascension of himself how would he tell Saul to reiterate the teachings of that snake den he opposed while in life?
Right.
We can't be sure. God's timing cannot be predicted.
Not to just Gentiles as can be seen below:
Acts 9
15 But the Lord said to him, "Go, for he is a chosen instrument of Mine, to bear My name before the Gentiles and kings and the sons of Israel;
You mean Paul had his own abridged version of the Gospel without the preaching of Jesus!
Is that really the Gospel in totality?
Qualified people have been churning out their own convenient theology since the ministry of Paul!
Moon of Isaiah,
Nowadays the New Testament "critical scholars " commonly judge paul's writings to 35-55 AD, while they commonly judge other epistles and NT books to later dates. These "critical scholars" also propose that NT beliefs also developed or formed over the course of the 1st century. So in John 21 if you notice the writer makes a clarification on earlier Christian beliefs about whether Jesus was coming back in John's lifetime.
As a result, I have had "critical" thinkers claim to me that the apostles didn't even teach the resurrection appearances originally and that it was put in the gospels in 60-110 AD To make this argument they are forced to claim that Paul's narration of them to the Corinthians was a later interpolation not made by Paul. Why? Because Paul's letters are from 35-55 AD, showing that this really was a teaching already in apostolic times!
This shows how essential Paul's writings are to understanding the early stages of Christianity, even if you were to take a pharisaic viewpoint and to disagree with Paul about the importance of faith over Law and circumcision.
The OT are teachings for an obsolete generation. They are no longer meant for today.
Not correct. If Paul and Jesus were in Jerusalem at the same time, it is very likely that Paul heard Jesus preach. But we can never know this for sure
John's concern was not Paul, but other false apostles. "Wannabe" apostles was a problem in the early church. By the time Revelation was written, Paul had been dead for many years already, so not likely that John had Paul in mind. We also know from Acts that the main leaders in Jerusalem did accept Paul and his teaching
Paul bore the sings of an apostle, that's what makes him an apostle. Paul didn't even care about titles. he taught that such things are for carnal Christians. We see this in Corinthians.
Paul saw himself as especially called for his mission. He said "even from my mother's womb," in Galatians 1:15, so that "I might preach Christ among the Gentiles," verse 16. In 2 Corinthians 1:1, he said he was convinced that it was "by the will of God" that he was called to his mission.
He said that it was "by revelation there was made known unto me the mystery." Ephesians 3:3. "The mystery" that he was referring to had to do with both worlds... the Jews and Gentiles were destined to become one Body in Christ Jesus. Ephesians 3:6. God called Paul to make the mystery happen.
There is only one version of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
The gospel is the "good news" that Jesus lived, was crucified, was buried, and arose. That is the gospel (good news) in a nutshell.
I wouldn't call the Scripture that tells about Paul's education a theology.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?