Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
....all that in 50 MY's. WOW!!!! Parallel beneficial mutations...
Oh the claims of the evo-crowd.
Now, if you don't understand that so-called beneficial mutations MUST add to a previous change to allow for your "short" list of proto-dolphin changes...I can understand why you are having problem and can't move away from your coloring book evolutionism.
Why do you think that multiple organs could not adapt at the same time? There is no reason to think otherwise. A change that helped breathing, such as the nostrils moving back in a whale, would not interfere with other changes such as changes in the limbs. It seems that you are not allowing yourself to understand a very simple concept.
Yes, the evo-theory would need multiple organs to evolve at the same time. Basically a feeding frenzy of so-called beneficial mutations.
When you can demonstrate that there is enough so-called beneficial mutations...each one occurring in the proper DNA...through out the evolving animal progeny....get back to me. Otherwise all you have is "opinion" ...unsupported opinion. Coloring book opinion.
....all that in 50 MY's. WOW!!!! Parallel beneficial mutations...
.
Thank you for continuing to show that one does not need to deny science to be a Christian. Seriously I think that science deniers do far more harm to Christianity than any atheist ever could.Are you not aware that 50 million years is a long time? That's like going back to the time of Jesus, and then that far again, and again, 25,000 times! It's a lot more time than needed, in fact. As the data already posted shows, beneficial mutations aren't hard to come by, even in a much smaller time.
heck, we've seen lizards evolve new organ structures in just decades - less than a millionth of the time we are talking about here. Not sure what you are having a problem with, aside from obstinancy.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080421-lizard-evolution.html
In Christ-
Papias
Once you've determined that the mutation is beneficial, how could it not be occurring in the proper DNA? What does this even mean?When you can demonstrate that there is enough so-called beneficial mutations...each one occurring in the proper DNA...
Where else would a beneficial mutation in an animal be, but in that animal's progeny? Again, I can't even figure out what your objections are supposed to mean.through out the evolving animal progeny
Once you've determined that the mutation is beneficial, how could it not be occurring in the proper DNA? What does this even mean?
Where else would a beneficial mutation in an animal be, but in that animal's progeny? Again, I can't even figure out what your objections are supposed to mean.
Are you not aware that 50 million years is a long time? That's like going back to the time of Jesus, and then that far again, and again, 25,000 times! It's a lot more time than needed, in fact. As the data already posted shows, beneficial mutations aren't hard to come by, even in a much smaller time.
heck, we've seen lizards evolve new organ structures in just decades - less than a millionth of the time we are talking about here. Not sure what you are having a problem with, aside from obstinancy.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080421-lizard-evolution.html
In Christ-
Papias
I have already explained to you that placement of genes is not nearly as relevant as you seem to think it is. A gene on an X chromosome transposed to chromosome 2 would still do the same thing. In fact, chromosomes have been seen to split and merge together within our lifetime. The form of Down Syndrome that runs in families is a great example; the parents are unaffected by their chromosomes being different, but a portion of their kids are carriers and another portion have symptoms.Yes, the evo-theory would need multiple organs to evolve at the same time. Basically a feeding frenzy of so-called beneficial mutations.
When you can demonstrate that there is enough so-called beneficial mutations...each one occurring in the proper DNA...through out the evolving animal progeny....get back to me. Otherwise all you have is "opinion" ...unsupported opinion. Coloring book opinion.
Again, you need to find valid sources. Not sources where they tell their workers that they cannot use the scientific method. All that work at your creationist sites are people that are failures at best in the science that they attack. I would ask you if you could support your claims with valid sources but I know that you can't.There's a little problem with your lizard evolution...You gotta do better.
But Answers in Genesis anatomist David Menton, after reviewing the research, noted that the original lizards did have the ability to digest plant material; they simply preferred insects for roughly 95 percent of their dietary needs. (This is also in line with the Bible’s teaching that all animals were originally vegetarian—which would mean these lizards’ ancestors, at least, had the capability to digest plants, and that genetic information could exist latently in the modern lizards.)
Furthermore, Menton adds, “The ‘new’ muscular valve they found between the small and large intestine is simply an enlargement of muscles already present in the gut wall at this juncture.” In other words, far from being a truly new feature, the shift in available food allowed lizards with larger muscles at the juncture to be more successful at feeding and reproducing.
Full article.
When mutations take place, however, there is an exchange of information or misinformation, but never an increase. The system is limited to what it has and therefore cannot create new codes.
Evolutionism would be like dealing yourself a bridge hand....then shuffling the deck and dealing yourself another bridge hand with just one card changing..making the hand better. Then you have to do it again, and again...
We can argue about that all day long...but in reality were talking about odds you can't get over.
Yes, the evo-theory would need multiple organs to evolve at the same time. Basically a feeding frenzy of so-called beneficial mutations.
When you can demonstrate that there is enough so-called beneficial mutations...each one occurring in the proper DNA
...through out the evolving animal progeny....get back to me. Otherwise all you have is "opinion" ...unsupported opinion. Coloring book opinion.
I have already explained to you that placement of genes is not nearly as relevant as you seem to think it is.
No. See, in evolution, there are these things called natural selection and inheritability of traits.
But I understand that you need to pretend as if those aren't real.
Natural selection isn't random.
Neither is inheritance of DNA.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?