Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Good point. That's another reason why I usually like talking with them.
I've noticed that there are an awful lot of anti-Trinitarians online in various social media sites these days, thinking they're the true Christians. I usually can't help but refute their belief that Christ is a created being, given how unbiblical and obviously false that teaching is. Still, they insist even in the face of sound reasoning. I comment not so much for their sake, knowing they likely won't recant. I suppose it's more for the sake of others who might otherwise be confused and be lead astray into heresy.
They are convinced Unitarianism is the truth and the JWs are especially convinced that they are the only ones who are rightI think it’s a combo of sincere truth seeking, but only through their own reason.
They are convinced Unitarianism is the truth and the JWs are especially convinced that they are the only ones who are right
If you Google Christian forums it's the third result. I don't know if I can post the name on this forum but I call it Cultianity Board . I understand the same thing is going on on other forumswell, neither of those would be an issue if they had the history or evidence to back that up.
If you Google Christian forums it's the third result. I don't know if I can post the name on this forum but I call it Cultianity Board . I understand the same thing is going on on other forums
It will really make you do some research to be able to debate and discuss with these people
for me, both LDS and the JWs kept coming back for months.
I've been in the drive thru and when I got to the window they said the person in front of you paid for your food and said to give you this. It was a card for Church of the Highlands. It's happened twice.
It's pretty hard to argue with such reasoning. Even if one made the claim that God became "Love" after He made creatures for himself to love, then how is He also the God in Whom "change" is not possible, which is also a teaching of the Bible. The phrase that we often here in our Liturgical prayer, ... "Thou art ever-existing and eternally the same..." is directly derived from Biblical teaching. God, therefore, does not undergo "development", regardless of what LDS people choose to believe about the Father, Who at one time, according to them, was no different than we are now, and that he grew from being a simple human to become the "god" that He is today, and that we also are undergoing that same evolution, so that we too will become "gods", just as He is. Such ideas are completely alien to what was ever believed in Judaism, or in Christendom.Really? Man, they must have thought you a prize to be worth the fight.
After I had an episode with four JW's at my house, they never returned. In a very polite conversation, I led them in this way:
ME: Do you agree that the Bible says that God is love?
THEM: Yes. Sure
ME: So, in order for God to be love, there must be someone for Him to love?
THEM: Uh, okay. Sounds right.
ME: So, if Jesus Christ is not God who existed with the Father from always, then who did God love when He was alone? If there was a time that God did not exist as a Trinity, then how could He be love with no one to love?
ONE OF THEM: Gosh, I never thought of it like that.
CULT LEADER: It's been nice talking with you, but we have to go.
Never saw them again, even though I invited them back.
Really? Man, they must have thought you a prize to be worth the fight.
After I had an episode with four JW's at my house, they never returned. In a very polite conversation, I led them in this way:
ME: Do you agree that the Bible says that God is love?
THEM: Yes. Sure
ME: So, in order for God to be love, there must be someone for Him to love?
THEM: Uh, okay. Sounds right.
ME: So, if Jesus Christ is not God who existed with the Father from always, then who did God love when He was alone? If there was a time that God did not exist as a Trinity, then how could He be love with no one to love?
ONE OF THEM: Gosh, I never thought of it like that.
CULT LEADER: It's been nice talking with you, but we have to go.
Never saw them again, even though I invited them back.
God, therefore, does not undergo "development", regardless of what LDS people choose to believe about the Father, Who at one time, according to them, was no different than we are now, and that he grew from being a simple human to become the "god" that He is today, and that we also are undergoing that same evolution, so that we too will become "gods", just as He is.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?