B
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do each of these Churches have complete skulls, or does each have a part of a skull. I ask because it is not uncommon to encase part of a relic in a reliquary shaped like the whole. For example, a monastery in Northern Greece has one of the knuckle bones of St John the Russian in a reliquary in the shape of the complete hand. The reliquary has a compartment for the knuckle bone which is in the location of that knuckle bone, had the whole hand been present. For someone who didn't know, they could easily assume that the whole hand was contained in the reliquary and only that one bone was exposed.2. At present there are at least seven skulls of John the Baptist which have been fully authenticated, verified, and consecrated and now reside in various churches.
Do each of these Churches have complete skulls, or does each have a part of a skull. I ask because it is not uncommon to encase part of a relic in a reliquary shaped like the whole. For example, a monastery in Northern Greece has one of the knuckle bones of St John the Russian in a reliquary in the shape of the complete hand. The reliquary has a compartment for the knuckle bone which is in the location of that knuckle bone, had the whole hand been present. For someone who didn't know, they could easily assume that the whole hand was contained in the reliquary and only that one bone was exposed.
I would expect that a reliquary for part of the skull of St John the Forerunner and Baptist would similarly be shaped like the complete skull. People would mistakenly assume that it actually contained a complete skull.
Do you have detailed information on each of the claimed relics of St John's head? Can you confirm one way or the other how much of a skull each Church has? Which Churches claim to have St John's head?
John
I cannot find seven skulls. The most I can find reference to are three skulls, and it is not certain whether two of them are complete.
There is the one in the Cathedral of Amiens, France, which may only be the front of the skull, there is one in the Treasury of the Topkapi Palace in Istanbul which may only be the top of the skull, and there is a complete skull (unlikely candidate considering what it has been through) in Rome. There are also a number of pieces of his skull in a small number of churches. From what I can see the one in Rome is bogus and the others are all parts of the one skull. If you can provide more detailed photographs or information regarding the relics in France and Turkey I would appreciate it.
John
What is the purpose of your thread ?
Ummm .... did you do much of a check on the sites you linked
Do you think its possible that some of your sources may be in fact "many headed" ?
Some of these sites seem a little bit "too much" !
So, what is the affiliation and background of the "Michael Gabriel and Raphael Foundation" ?
What do you know about the "International Crusade for Holy Relics" folks ?
Check this out (intro page to "The Forbidden Knowledge" site you linked):This domain is dedicated to the teaching of knowledge that was hidden from the human race all through history. Your government is poised to inject you with a tracking chip manufactured by Applied Digital Solutions called, "Veri Chip". Don't believe me? Click below, I'll prove it to you.
I think this question is probably answered in my OP. The purpose is to answer the questions I posted in reference to the facts that I stated.
If some wish to call those facts into question I am willing to entertain that discussion, as well. Of course, one must admit that it is highly improbable that any person has ever had more than one head, much less at least seven. However, the probability is not in question here.
If I am not mistaken (and I am open to correction) both the Roman and the Eastern Orthodox Churches have not denied the authenticity of the others' relics in this case.
If someone has determined to the satisfaction of either body that some or all of the skulls in question are invalid I am quite interested in seeing the documentation to that effect.
Here is the information from the website "Saints Alive" for the International Crusade for Holy Relics - [SIZE=-1]
Chevalier Thomas J.Serafin V.V. presents for the faithful "SAINTS ALIVE", an educational website promoting the "cultus of the saints". "SAINTS ALIVE" is a not-for-profit lay apostolate founded to restore and maintain the dignity of the remains of the saints and promote proper veneration. "SAINTS ALIVE" is an independent member of the International Crusade for Holy Relics of which Mr. Serafin is the founder. This website is the official site for the USA Territorial Headquarters of the ICHR/USA.
It appears that it is a Roman Catholic organization. From the website there is nothing to suggest that they are not sincere in their mission.
[/SIZE]
The answer to your questions is in the master number encoded in your DNA.
Why do you have the expectation that the RC and EO are charged with being busybodies and constantly checking for logs in each others eyes
Did you notice that the pictures are not holograms ? That one skull does not seem complete, and the other site says a part ? Have you considered the meaning of symbolon and the relationship of this concept to whole and part ?
And:
do you really think the Masons guided the creation of Adam and Eve ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?