Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
How it Was Done: 9/11 and the Science of Building Demolition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Btodd" data-source="post: 66147246" data-attributes="member: 14939"><p>In a controlled demolition, before cutter charges are set, torches are used to 'pre-cut' the beams. This is where the cutter charge is placed, and serves to sever the rest of the beam when it goes off. </p><p></p><p>So what is the thermite for? To carry out what the torch already does, except that you now need tons and tons of thermite, some delivery system that also overcomes the challenge of getting thermite to go sideways through a vertical beam, and for...WHAT? So you increase your chances of failure, or getting caught...for WHAT?</p><p></p><p>On top of that, the collapses in the Twin Towers occurred from the points of impact. They were a top-down collapse, with no chain of charges going off prior to collapse.</p><p></p><p>THIS is what those charges sound like. We've already established that the idea of using thermite to do what is normally done by a torch during set-up is absurd and unnecessary, but to top it off...suddenly, we are supposed to believe that multiple charges, capable of severing these beams (and according to YOU, violently snapping and ejecting beams at 80+ mph, a much greater force than any standard demolitions charge)...were really, really quiet, too.</p><p></p><p>Yeah, makes tons of sense.</p><p></p><p>Here's what a demolition looks and sounds like...exactly what DIDN'T happen on 9/11.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U4erFzhC-U" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U4erFzhC-U</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Btodd</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Btodd, post: 66147246, member: 14939"] In a controlled demolition, before cutter charges are set, torches are used to 'pre-cut' the beams. This is where the cutter charge is placed, and serves to sever the rest of the beam when it goes off. So what is the thermite for? To carry out what the torch already does, except that you now need tons and tons of thermite, some delivery system that also overcomes the challenge of getting thermite to go sideways through a vertical beam, and for...WHAT? So you increase your chances of failure, or getting caught...for WHAT? On top of that, the collapses in the Twin Towers occurred from the points of impact. They were a top-down collapse, with no chain of charges going off prior to collapse. THIS is what those charges sound like. We've already established that the idea of using thermite to do what is normally done by a torch during set-up is absurd and unnecessary, but to top it off...suddenly, we are supposed to believe that multiple charges, capable of severing these beams (and according to YOU, violently snapping and ejecting beams at 80+ mph, a much greater force than any standard demolitions charge)...were really, really quiet, too. Yeah, makes tons of sense. Here's what a demolition looks and sounds like...exactly what DIDN'T happen on 9/11. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U4erFzhC-U[/URL] Btodd [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
How it Was Done: 9/11 and the Science of Building Demolition
Top
Bottom