Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
How it Was Done: 9/11 and the Science of Building Demolition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ManFromUncle" data-source="post: 66144546"><p>What blurry photo are you talking about? I have never once referred to a blurry photo.</p><p></p><p>And what is so confusing about using a combination of methods for a large and complex demolition in which there is no room for error? It's not a tough concept, even for the layman who just understands what thermite and regular demolition charges are. Thermite would attack the strong points and start eating them away before final countdown, standard linear shaped charges (described in the post) would finish the job. </p><p></p><p>The thermite actually helps explain the puzzles of why people were jumping even after the fires were burned out, as the <a href="http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/audiotape.html" target="_blank">firefighters were reporting</a>. 5,000 degree heat coming from the core would be intolerable.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/audiotape.html" target="_blank">9-11 Research: Firefighter Audiotape</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ManFromUncle, post: 66144546"] What blurry photo are you talking about? I have never once referred to a blurry photo. And what is so confusing about using a combination of methods for a large and complex demolition in which there is no room for error? It's not a tough concept, even for the layman who just understands what thermite and regular demolition charges are. Thermite would attack the strong points and start eating them away before final countdown, standard linear shaped charges (described in the post) would finish the job. The thermite actually helps explain the puzzles of why people were jumping even after the fires were burned out, as the [URL="http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/audiotape.html"]firefighters were reporting[/URL]. 5,000 degree heat coming from the core would be intolerable. [url=http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/audiotape.html]9-11 Research: Firefighter Audiotape[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
How it Was Done: 9/11 and the Science of Building Demolition
Top
Bottom