Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
How it Was Done: 9/11 and the Science of Building Demolition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Edial" data-source="post: 65916450" data-attributes="member: 90251"><p>Yes, intense pockets of fire were definitely there.</p><p>I recall seeing flames coming off one side of the building (1 or 2) out of several windows.</p><p>This is an office fire fueled by jet fuel.</p><p></p><p>When house burns there are many metallic leftover items, like forks, even watches (glass is melted but the casing is there).</p><p></p><p>We are talking about really thick steel beams.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But look at the size of the hole on the building itself. The wings damaged mostly the outside of the building.</p><p>Beams were knocked off and there is a hole several human heights.</p><p></p><p>In comparison to the rest of the building the hole itself is not large at all.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The point is, the fact that this poor redheaded lady who was standing at the whole waving to get attention (really, really sad), also showed there were no flames there.</p><p></p><p>The point is the most of the fires should be at (or around) the point of impact.</p><p></p><p>The fact that there weren't fires in that area, really raises questions whether or not airplane induced fires melted the steel.</p><p></p><p>Thanks,</p><p>Ed</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Edial, post: 65916450, member: 90251"] Yes, intense pockets of fire were definitely there. I recall seeing flames coming off one side of the building (1 or 2) out of several windows. This is an office fire fueled by jet fuel. When house burns there are many metallic leftover items, like forks, even watches (glass is melted but the casing is there). We are talking about really thick steel beams. But look at the size of the hole on the building itself. The wings damaged mostly the outside of the building. Beams were knocked off and there is a hole several human heights. In comparison to the rest of the building the hole itself is not large at all. The point is, the fact that this poor redheaded lady who was standing at the whole waving to get attention (really, really sad), also showed there were no flames there. The point is the most of the fires should be at (or around) the point of impact. The fact that there weren't fires in that area, really raises questions whether or not airplane induced fires melted the steel. Thanks, Ed [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
How it Was Done: 9/11 and the Science of Building Demolition
Top
Bottom