Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yikes. Reading comprehension anyone?
Of course, freedom, I gave you no reason whatsoever to assume that I called all evolutionist' atheists by the simple fact that...watch for it...I said " Evolutions AND atheists. Simple enough right?
Gee, Well, first i'll start with Scripture teaches Creationism not evolution. Maybe we can start there instead. Do you believe any of the Bible is true or just some of it? Did God think his creation was very good due to the process of evolution and natural selection? Also, why would there be a need for natural selection before the fall of Adam and even in the garden?
It just a very flawed argument to make that there is any support whatsoever for evolution from a Biblical view. The Bible doesn;t support it and Science doesn't either.
Changes in finch beaks is variation within a species, not the TOE.
Actually scripture teaches creation...the actual method is left to God.
The bible makes it clear that the heavens declare the glory of God. They are His work, His other revelation. He did not deliberately place false information in them or in the earth in order to deceive us.
Empty rhetoric from the willfully ignorant will never change reality.
Did rocks evolve into loaves and fishes?
We deny an incapable mechanism? Which scientific community are you talking about? Methodological naturalism?
We're not the ones denying the mechanism.
Lucky to have any? So, if we are so lucky to have any fossils (which you are right) then tell me how in the world out of all of the millions upon million of fossils that should be scattered all over the entire globe that the very very very few we do have, just happen to line up perfectly for a few transitional sequences as the Scientists say they have? The whale being one.
Talk about luck!! Finding a needle blah blah...just because someone SAYS it's intermediate doesn't make it so. They have no idea at all just like in 1000 years when someone finds a Penguin fossil they will say it's a seal to bird or bird to seal intermediate. All quesses. That's what the TOE is, one big quess.
When you make God into a supernatural being, like other gods, like angels, or fairies? you make God into another idol.
No they don't.As i said, materialists ask us on a daily basis to exalt computers and other material things.
so it's Ok to worship angels is it?And no, a supernatural entity is not an idol, a physical object as a physical object is
They tend to stay away from the mechanism and we have to debate "volumes and volumes" of irrelevance.
I call the theory naturalistic for the very reason that it takes the naturalistic view of nature. It isn't redundant,it's true.
No,it cannot be verified. The theory is a narrative of the history of life on earth,which is not something that can be repeated by experiment.
Order is that which is arranged by intelligence. Functioning order is purposeful,as with organisms. It is not just patterns and sequences that passively occur.
Natural selection is just the dying off of creatures with certain traits that are thought to be unfavorable to survival and reproductive success,leaving creatures with traits that are thought to be favorable.
It is a process of elimination. Darwin thought that it produced the existing variety of species,but it does not produce anything. Creatures that are better suited to their environment can continue to reproduce without the less suited dying off.
Theistic evolution is usually just an acceptance of the theory of evolution as it is commonly taught with the claim that God moves the processes of evolution. But the theory itself does not allow for God to be doing anything because it is naturalistic.
And it ignores the fact that species exist as individual creatures (individual creations) that come into being immediately through the means of conception or reproduction
...and instead views species as developing gradually into existence from and into other species,without any specific beginnings.
Gee, Well, first i'll start with Scripture teaches Creationism not evolution. Maybe we can start there instead.
Do you believe any of the Bible is true or just some of it?
Did God think his creation was very good due to the process of evolution and natural selection?
Also, why would there be a need for natural selection before the fall of Adam and even in the garden?
It just a very flawed argument to make that there is any support whatsoever for evolution from a Biblical view. The Bible doesn;t support it
and Science doesn't either.
Changes in finch beaks is variation within a species, not the TOE.
Lucky to have any? So, if we are so lucky to have any fossils (which you are right) then tell me how in the world out of all of the millions upon million of fossils that should be scattered all over the entire globe that the very very very few we do have, just happen to line up perfectly for a few transitional sequences as the Scientists say they have?
Talk about luck!! Finding a needle blah blah...just because someone SAYS it's intermediate doesn't make it so. They have no idea at all just like in 1000 years when someone finds a Penguin fossil they will say it's a seal to bird or bird to seal intermediate. All quesses. That's what the TOE is, one big quess.
Lucky to have any? So, if we are so lucky to have any fossils (which you are right) then tell me how in the world out of all of the millions upon million of fossils that should be scattered all over the entire globe that the very very very few we do have, just happen to line up perfectly for a few transitional sequences as the Scientists say they have? The whale being one.
Talk about luck!! Finding a needle blah blah...just because someone SAYS it's intermediate doesn't make it so. They have no idea at all just like in 1000 years when someone finds a Penguin fossil they will say it's a seal to bird or bird to seal intermediate. All quesses. That's what the TOE is, one big quess.
Gee, Well, first i'll start with Scripture teaches Creationism not evolution.
Maybe we can start there instead. Do you believe any of the Bible is true or just some of it?
Did God think his creation was very good due to the process of evolution and natural selection? Also, why would there be a need for natural selection before the fall of Adam and even in the garden?
It just a very flawed argument to make that there is any support whatsoever for evolution from a Biblical view. The Bible doesn;t support it and Science doesn't either.
Changes in finch beaks is variation within a species, not the TOE.
They think Creationisits are stupid and uneducated
That's what the TOE is, one big guess.
germ theory.
I think that it will always be an ongoing debate in forums such as this one. In the scientific community however, it is over. Evolution is the only useful paradigm for studying the life sciences and an old earth is the only useful way to interpret what we see in the earth. There is no debate for scientists working in the field.I feel it will always be an ongoing debate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?