Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
How do you do creation science research?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="juvenissun" data-source="post: 58570614" data-attributes="member: 184066"><p>Not that easy. We do not know what does the the number from the calculation mean. We assume it is, for example 15 m.y. We do not really know it is 15 m.y.. In other word, we do not understand the nature of radiometric decay. </p><p></p><p>You continuously try to put God into the realm of science (such as hypothesis, falsify, prove, etc.). That is wrong. For example, something God can do, but are like magics to us. So when we study the nature by science, you may close your eyes to things that can not be explained by science. But if you do not, then you should consider God. It is true 1000 years ago. The key fact is that it is still true today. (example: before radiometric dating, we do not understand geology. with radiometric dating now, we still do not understand geology.)</p><p></p><p>Since creationism = science + God, then the correct question for you to ask is: what is the content on the "God" part? If you continuously try to jam God into science, then you do not understand that simple definition, and you do not try to understand it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="juvenissun, post: 58570614, member: 184066"] Not that easy. We do not know what does the the number from the calculation mean. We assume it is, for example 15 m.y. We do not really know it is 15 m.y.. In other word, we do not understand the nature of radiometric decay. You continuously try to put God into the realm of science (such as hypothesis, falsify, prove, etc.). That is wrong. For example, something God can do, but are like magics to us. So when we study the nature by science, you may close your eyes to things that can not be explained by science. But if you do not, then you should consider God. It is true 1000 years ago. The key fact is that it is still true today. (example: before radiometric dating, we do not understand geology. with radiometric dating now, we still do not understand geology.) Since creationism = science + God, then the correct question for you to ask is: what is the content on the "God" part? If you continuously try to jam God into science, then you do not understand that simple definition, and you do not try to understand it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
How do you do creation science research?
Top
Bottom